Literature DB >> 8245336

Determinants of successful nonthoracotomy cardioverter-defibrillator implantation: experience in 101 patients using two different lead systems.

R Brooks1, H Garan, D Torchiana, G J Vlahakes, G Jackson, J Newell, B A McGovern, J N Ruskin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study was conducted to identify the determinants of successful nonthoracotomy cardioverter-defibrillator implantation.
BACKGROUND: Until recently, either median sternotomy or thoracotomy was necessary to implant the electrodes used for internal cardioverter-defibrillator systems. A number of manufacturers have developed nonthoracotomy lead systems comprising two transvenous coil electrodes and a subcutaneous patch electrode. At present, the factors associated with the success or failure of a nonthoracotomy approach are unknown.
METHODS: A total of 101 consecutive patients requiring a cardioverter-defibrillator underwent an initial nonthoracotomy approach. Factors associated with successful nonthoracotomy implantation were prospectively determined.
RESULTS: A nonthoracotomy system was implanted in 72 (71%) of 101 patients. Twenty-nine patients (29%) required thoracotomy. Univariate predictors of successful nonthoracotomy implantation included smaller cardiac size (p < 0.0001), smaller cardiothoracic ratio (p < 0.0002), QRS duration < 120 ms (p = 0.003), female gender (p = 0.006), ventricular fibrillation as the presenting arrhythmia (p = 0.03) and smaller echocardiographic left ventricular size (p = 0.04). Multivariate predictors included smaller cardiac size (p < 0.002) and female gender (p < 0.007). Total actuarial survival over a mean (+/- SD) follow-up interval of 12 +/- 7 months was 91 +/- 0.03% and was not different in the thoracotomy and nonthoracotomy groups.
CONCLUSIONS: A nonthoracotomy cardioverter-defibrillator system can be implanted in a majority of patients. Smaller cardiac size and female gender are associated with a high probability of successful implantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8245336     DOI: 10.1016/0735-1097(93)90766-t

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  4 in total

1.  The role of mechanoelectric feedback in vulnerability to electric shock.

Authors:  Weihui Li; Viatcheslav Gurev; Andrew D McCulloch; Natalia A Trayanova
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  2008-02-16       Impact factor: 3.667

2.  Defibrillation efficacy with endocardial electrodes is influenced by reductions in cardiac preload.

Authors:  J S Strobel; G N Kay; G P Walcott; W M Smith; R E Ideker
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 1.900

3.  Randomized comparison of a 90 uF capacitor three-electrode defibrillation system with a 125 uF two-electrode defibrillation system.

Authors:  M Bahu; B P Knight; R Weiss; S J Hahn; R Goyal; E G Daoud; K C Man; F Morady; S A Strickberger
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 4.  Rabbit models of cardiac mechano-electric and mechano-mechanical coupling.

Authors:  T Alexander Quinn; Peter Kohl
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 3.667

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.