Literature DB >> 9869577

Evaluation of several dosing regimens of cefepime, with various simulations of renal function, against clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a pharmacodynamic infection model.

D M Cappelletty1.   

Abstract

The objectives of this study were as follows: (i) to examine the killing activity of 2-g doses of cefepime against two clinical isolates (mucoid and nonmucoid) of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a pharmacodynamic in vitro infection model, (ii) to compare the percentage of time above the MIC (T > MIC) for each of the regimens against P. aeruginosa, and (iii) to evaluate the area under the bactericidal curve for each regimen. Cefepime was administered at intervals of 8, 12, and 24 h with and without tobramycin, and two different levels of renal function were simulated: normal (creatinine clearance [CLCR] = 90 ml/min) and decreased (CRCL = 60 ml/min). Also, the killing activity of cefepime with and without tobramycin was compared to the killing activity of ceftazidime (2 g every 8 h) with and without tobramycin. The T > MIC was 100% in the central chamber except for the regimen in which cefepime was administered every 12 h and the CLCR was 90 ml/min, which provided concentrations above the MIC for 92% of the dosing interval against the C31 (mucoid; MIC of cefepime, 4 microg/ml) isolate and for 75% of the interval against the C34 (nonmucoid; MIC of cefepime, 8 microg/ml) isolate. All cefepime and ceftazidime monotherapy simulations resulted in 99.9% killing of the nonmucoid isolate within 4 to 8 h and within 4 to 6 h, respectively. Against the mucoid isolate, 99.9% killing was achieved only with combination therapy. The results of this study indicate that cefepime dosed at 2 g every 12 h under conditions of normal renal function and every 24 h with decreased creatinine clearance (60 ml/min) is effective both as monotherapy and in combination therapy against a nonmucoid strain of P. aeruginosa. With cefepime MICs of 4 and 8 microg/ml, the single-agent regimens provided T > MIC values in the central chamber for 92 and >/=75% of the dosing interval against the mucoid and nonmucoid isolates, respectively. Cefepime dosed at 2 g every 12 h, with a creatinine clearance of 90 ml/min, and every 24 h, with a creatinine clearance of 60 ml/min, resulted in killing activity equivalent to that of ceftazidime dosed at 2 g every 8 h. None of the monotherapies provided adequate killing of the mucoid strain of P. aeruginosa despite drug concentrations being above the MIC for >/=92% of all dosing intervals. Finally, combination therapy with tobramycin and either cefepime or ceftazidime enhanced the killing of both the mucoid and nonmucoid P. aeruginosa isolates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9869577      PMCID: PMC89032     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  17 in total

1.  Pharmacokinetics and tissue penetration of cefepime.

Authors:  K J Nye; Y G Shi; J M Andrews; R Wise
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 5.790

2.  Influence of surface area/volume ratio on the kinetics of antibiotics in different tissues and tissue fluids.

Authors:  D M Ryan
Journal:  Scand J Infect Dis Suppl       Date:  1985

3.  Pharmacokinetics of cefepime in subjects with renal insufficiency.

Authors:  R H Barbhaiya; C A Knupp; S T Forgue; G R Matzke; D R Guay; K A Pittman
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 6.875

4.  LAGRAN program for area and moments in pharmacokinetic analysis.

Authors:  M L Rocci; W J Jusko
Journal:  Comput Programs Biomed       Date:  1983-06

5.  Effect of the ratio of surface area to volume on the penetration of antibiotics in to extravascular spaces in an in vitro model.

Authors:  L L Van Etta; L R Peterson; C E Fasching; D N Gerding
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 5.226

6.  Novel method for measurement of outer membrane permeability to new beta-lactams in intact Enterobacter cloacae cells.

Authors:  F Bellido; J C Pechère; R E Hancock
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Reevaluation of the factors involved in the efficacy of new beta-lactams against Enterobacter cloacae.

Authors:  F Bellido; J C Pechère; R E Hancock
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Enhanced activity of combination of tobramycin and piperacillin for eradication of sessile biofilm cells of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  H Anwar; J W Costerton
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Pharmacokinetic disposition and bactericidal activities of cefepime, ceftazidime, and cefoperazone in serum and blister fluid.

Authors:  D Kalman; S L Barriere; B L Johnson
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Interface-area-to-volume ratio of interstitial fluid in humans determined by pharmacokinetic analysis of netilmicin in small and large skin blisters.

Authors:  J Blaser; H L Rieder; R Lüthy
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  4 in total

1.  Pharmacodynamics, a tool for a better use of antibiotics?

Authors:  F Crokaert
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Pharmacodynamics of cefepime alone and in combination with various antimicrobials against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in an in vitro pharmacodynamic infection model.

Authors:  Vanthida Huang; Michael J Rybak
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 3.  What Antibiotic Exposures Are Required to Suppress the Emergence of Resistance for Gram-Negative Bacteria? A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Chandra Datta Sumi; Aaron J Heffernan; Jeffrey Lipman; Jason A Roberts; Fekade B Sime
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  Low-dose beta-lactam plus amikacin in febrile neutropenia: cefepime vs. piperacillin/tazobactam, a randomized trial.

Authors:  L Gómez; C Estrada; I Gómez; M Márquez; C Estany; J M Martí; R Bastús; L Cirera; S Quintana; J Garau
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2010-02-27       Impact factor: 3.267

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.