UNLABELLED: Lymphoscintigraphy associated with radioguided biopsy of the sentinel node (SN) is well established in clinical practice for melanoma. In breast cancer, the SN concept is similarly valid, and lymphoscintigraphy is a useful method for localizing the axillary SN. The aim of this study was to optimize the lymphoscintigraphy technique in association with a gamma ray detecting probe (GDP) for identifying and removing the SN in breast cancer patients. METHODS: Two-hundred fifty patients with operable breast tumor underwent lymphoscintigraphy before surgery. Three different size ranges of 99mTc-labeled colloid particles (<50, <80 and 200-1000 nm) were used, with either subdermal (above tumor) or peritumoral injection. Early and late scintigraphic images were obtained in anterior and oblique projections, and the skin projection of the detected SN was marked. Sentinel nodes were identified and removed with the aid of the GDP during breast surgery; they were tagged separately. Complete axillary dissection followed. In 40 patients, a blue dye was also administered in addition to subdermal radiolabeled colloid to compare blue dye mapping with lymphoscintigraphy localization. RESULTS: Lymphoscintigraphy successfully revealed lymphatic drainage in 245 of 250 patients (98%). The axillary SN was identified in 240 patients (96%). SN biopsy correctly predicted axillary node status in 234 of 240 patients (97.5%). Lymphoscintigraphy and GDP detected the SN most easily and consistently when 200-1000 nm colloid was administered subdermally in an injection volume of 0.4 ml. Blue dye mapping was successful in 30 of 40 patients (75%). In 26 of these patients, the dye and lymphoscintigraphy identified the same node; in 4 cases different nodes were identified. None of these four patients had axillary disease. CONCLUSION: Lymphoscintigraphy is a simple procedure that is well tolerated by patients. Sentinel node identification is more reliable when large-size radiolabeled colloids are injected in a relatively small injection volume (0.4 ml). Use of a GDP greatly facilitates precise pinpointing and rapid removal of the SN.
UNLABELLED: Lymphoscintigraphy associated with radioguided biopsy of the sentinel node (SN) is well established in clinical practice for melanoma. In breast cancer, the SN concept is similarly valid, and lymphoscintigraphy is a useful method for localizing the axillary SN. The aim of this study was to optimize the lymphoscintigraphy technique in association with a gamma ray detecting probe (GDP) for identifying and removing the SN in breast cancerpatients. METHODS: Two-hundred fifty patients with operable breast tumor underwent lymphoscintigraphy before surgery. Three different size ranges of 99mTc-labeled colloid particles (<50, <80 and 200-1000 nm) were used, with either subdermal (above tumor) or peritumoral injection. Early and late scintigraphic images were obtained in anterior and oblique projections, and the skin projection of the detected SN was marked. Sentinel nodes were identified and removed with the aid of the GDP during breast surgery; they were tagged separately. Complete axillary dissection followed. In 40 patients, a blue dye was also administered in addition to subdermal radiolabeled colloid to compare blue dye mapping with lymphoscintigraphy localization. RESULTS: Lymphoscintigraphy successfully revealed lymphatic drainage in 245 of 250 patients (98%). The axillary SN was identified in 240 patients (96%). SN biopsy correctly predicted axillary node status in 234 of 240 patients (97.5%). Lymphoscintigraphy and GDP detected the SN most easily and consistently when 200-1000 nm colloid was administered subdermally in an injection volume of 0.4 ml. Blue dye mapping was successful in 30 of 40 patients (75%). In 26 of these patients, the dye and lymphoscintigraphy identified the same node; in 4 cases different nodes were identified. None of these four patients had axillary disease. CONCLUSION: Lymphoscintigraphy is a simple procedure that is well tolerated by patients. Sentinel node identification is more reliable when large-size radiolabeled colloids are injected in a relatively small injection volume (0.4 ml). Use of a GDP greatly facilitates precise pinpointing and rapid removal of the SN.
Authors: Giuseppe Trifirò; Giuseppe Viale; Oreste Gentilini; Laura Lavinia Travaini; Giovanni Paganelli Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2004-04-22 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: John Buscombe; Giovanni Paganelli; Zeynep E Burak; Wendy Waddington; Jean Maublant; Enrique Prats; Holger Palmedo; Orazio Schillaci; Lorenzo Maffioli; M Lassmann; Carlo Chiesa; Emilio Bombardieri; Arturo Chiti Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2007-12 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: S Mirzaei; M Rodrigues; B Hoffmann; P Knoll; M Riegler-Keil; W Kreuzer; H Salzer; H Köhn; A Polyák; G A Jánoki Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2003-04-04 Impact factor: 9.236