Literature DB >> 9866295

Hospital nurses' perceptions of the ethical climate of their work setting.

L L Olson1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To develop an instrument to measure how hospital nurses perceive the ethical climate of their work setting and to evaluate its psychometric properties. A way to measure ethical climate can help nurses understand the work setting influences on their practice and can be used to diagnose areas for organizational change as well as to evaluate effectiveness of organizational interventions.
DESIGN: Descriptive. Instrument developed was the Hospital Ethical Climate Survey (HECS). Sampled were 360 RNs (48% response rate) employed in clinical practice at two acute-care hospitals in one U.S. midwestern city. The nurses completed a questionnaire in 1993-1994 consisting of items developed to assess their perceptions of ethical climate, along with the 43-item Integrity Audit, a social desirability scale, and a demographic inventory.
METHODS: Construct validity was assessed by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) using the LISREL 7 statistical program.
RESULTS: The final CFA model consisted of 26 variables in five factors, which were organized according to the relationships of nurses with peers, patients, managers, hospital, and physicians. Internal consistency reliability, using Cronbach's alpha, for the final 26-item instrument was 0.91 (range 0.68 to 0.92) for the subscales.
CONCLUSIONS: The Hospital Ethical Climate Survey has acceptable initial reliability and validity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioethics and Professional Ethics; Empirical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9866295     DOI: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.1998.tb01331.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Image J Nurs Sch        ISSN: 0743-5150


  34 in total

1.  Moral Distress among Healthcare Managers: Conditions, Consequences and Potential Responses.

Authors:  Craig Mitton; Stuart Peacock; Jan Storch; Neale Smith; Evelyn Cornelissen
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2010-11

2.  Moral distress: a comparative analysis of theoretical understandings and inter-related concepts.

Authors:  Kim Lützén; Beatrice Ewalds Kvist
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2012-03

Review 3.  Review of measurement instruments in clinical and research ethics, 1999-2003.

Authors:  B K Redman
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.903

4.  Does fear of retaliation deter requests for ethics consultation?

Authors:  Marion Danis; Adrienne Farrar; Christine Grady; Carol Taylor; Patricia O'Donnell; Karen Soeken; Connie Ulrich
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2007-10-16

5.  Ethical climate, ethics stress, and the job satisfaction of nurses and social workers in the United States.

Authors:  Connie Ulrich; Patricia O'Donnell; Carol Taylor; Adrienne Farrar; Marion Danis; Christine Grady
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2007-07-09       Impact factor: 4.634

6.  Predictors of ethical stress, moral action and job satisfaction in health care social workers.

Authors:  Patricia O'Donnell; Adrienne Farrar; Karlynn BrintzenhofeSzoc; Ann Patrick Conrad; Marion Danis; Christine Grady; Carol Taylor; Connie M Ulrich
Journal:  Soc Work Health Care       Date:  2008

7.  Implementing a clinical ethics needs assessment survey: results of a pilot study (part 2 of 2).

Authors:  Andrea Frolic; Sandra Andreychuk; Wendy Seidlitz; Angela Djuric-Paulin; Barb Flaherty; Barb Jennings; Donna Peace
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2013-03

8.  Moral Stress and Job Burnout Among Frontline Staff Conducting Clinical Research on Affective and Anxiety Disorders.

Authors:  Adam L Fried; Celia B Fisher
Journal:  Prof Psychol Res Pr       Date:  2016-06

9.  Moral Stress, Moral Practice, and Ethical Climate in Community-Based Drug-Use Research: Views From the Front Line.

Authors:  Celia B Fisher; Gala True; Leslie Alexander; Adam L Fried
Journal:  AJOB Prim Res       Date:  2013-07-22

10.  Understanding ethical climate, moral distress, and burnout: a novel tool and a conceptual framework.

Authors:  Elizabeth Dzeng; J Randall Curtis
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 7.035

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.