Literature DB >> 17939060

Does fear of retaliation deter requests for ethics consultation?

Marion Danis1, Adrienne Farrar, Christine Grady, Carol Taylor, Patricia O'Donnell, Karen Soeken, Connie Ulrich.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reports suggest that some health care personnel fear retaliation from seeking ethics consultation. We therefore examined the prevalence and determinants of fear of retaliation and determined whether this fear is associated with diminished likelihood of consulting an ethics committee.
METHODS: We surveyed registered nurses (RNs) and social workers (SWs) in four US states to identify ethical problems they encounter. We developed a retaliation index (1-7 point range) with higher scores indicating a higher perceived likelihood of retaliation. Linear regression analysis was performed to identify socio-demographic and job characteristics associated with fear of retaliation. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine whether fear of retaliation was associated with less likelihood of seeking consultation.
RESULTS: Our sample (N = 1215) was primarily female (85%) and Caucasian (83%) with a mean age of 46 years and 17 years of practice. Among the sample, 293 (48.7%) RNs and 309 (51.3%) SWs reported access to an ethics consultation service. Amongst those with access, 2.8% (n = 17) personally experienced retaliation, 9.1% (n = 55) observed colleagues experience retaliation, 30.2% (n = 182) reported no experience with retaliation but considered it a realistic fear, and 50.8% (n = 305) did not perceive retaliation to be a problem. In logistic regression modeling, fear of retaliation was not associated with the likelihood (OR = 0.64; 95% CI = 0.22-1.89) or frequency of requesting ethics consultation (OR = 0.81; 95% CI = 0.27-2.38).
CONCLUSION: Fear of retaliation from seeking ethics consultation is common among nurses and social workers, nonetheless this fear is not associated with reduced requests for ethics consultation.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17939060     DOI: 10.1007/s11019-007-9105-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Health Care Philos        ISSN: 1386-7423


  10 in total

1.  The professional consequences of whistleblowing by nurses.

Authors:  S McDonald; K Ahern
Journal:  J Prof Nurs       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.104

2.  Ethical decision making in nurses. Relationships among moral reasoning, coping style, and ethics stress.

Authors:  M L Raines
Journal:  JONAS Healthc Law Ethics Regul       Date:  2000-03

3.  The personal and organizational costs of blowing the whistle.

Authors:  M C Silva; J M Sorrell; J J Fletcher
Journal:  Nursingconnections       Date:  1999

4.  Refining the measurement of physician job satisfaction: results from the Physician Worklife Survey. SGIM Career Satisfaction Study Group. Society of General Internal Medicine.

Authors:  E S Williams; T R Konrad; M Linzer; J McMurray; D E Pathman; M Gerrity; M D Schwartz; W E Scheckler; J Van Kirk; E Rhodes; J Douglas
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Two nurses and a doctor: health care workers allege retaliation for blowing the whistle on understaffing.

Authors:  G Frank
Journal:  J Emerg Nurs       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Hospital nurses' perceptions of the ethical climate of their work setting.

Authors:  L L Olson
Journal:  Image J Nurs Sch       Date:  1998

7.  What triggers requests for ethics consultations?

Authors:  G DuVal; L Sartorius; B Clarridge; G Gensler; M Danis
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.903

8.  Keeping moral space open. New images of ethics consulting.

Authors:  M U Walker
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  1993 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.683

9.  Advocacy in the mental health services field.

Authors:  N Fontaine; E Allard
Journal:  Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc       Date:  1997 Jan-Apr

10.  The beliefs of nurses who were involved in a whistleblowing event.

Authors:  Kathryn Ahern; Sally McDonald
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.187

  10 in total
  3 in total

1.  Perceptions of appropriateness of care in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Connie M Ulrich; Christine Grady
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Research on clinical ethics and consultation. Introduction to the theme.

Authors:  Stella Reiter-Theil; George J Agich
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2007-10-18

3.  Nurses confronting the coronavirus: Challenges met and lessons learned to date.

Authors:  Connie M Ulrich; Cynda H Rushton; Christine Grady
Journal:  Nurs Outlook       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 3.250

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.