Literature DB >> 9866196

Models of amino acid substitution and applications to mitochondrial protein evolution.

Z Yang1, R Nielsen, M Hasegawa.   

Abstract

Models of amino acid substitution were developed and compared using maximum likelihood. Two kinds of models are considered. "Empirical" models do not explicitly consider factors that shape protein evolution, but attempt to summarize the substitution pattern from large quantities of real data. "Mechanistic" models are formulated at the codon level and separate mutational biases at the nucleotide level from selective constraints at the amino acid level. They account for features of sequence evolution, such as transition-transversion bias and base or codon frequency biases, and make use of physicochemical distances between amino acids to specify nonsynonymous substitution rates. A general approach is presented that transforms a Markov model of codon substitution into a model of amino acid replacement. Protein sequences from the entire mitochondrial genomes of 20 mammalian species were analyzed using different models. The mechanistic models were found to fit the data better than empirical models derived from large databases. Both the mutational distance between amino acids (determined by the genetic code and mutational biases such as the transition-transversion bias) and the physicochemical distance are found to have strong effects on amino acid substitution rates. A significant proportion of amino acid substitutions appeared to have involved more than one codon position, indicating that nucleotide substitutions at neighboring sites may be correlated. Rates of amino acid substitution were found to be highly variable among sites.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9866196     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025888

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Evol        ISSN: 0737-4038            Impact factor:   16.240


  139 in total

1.  Selection at the amino acid level can influence synonymous codon usage: implications for the study of codon adaptation in plastid genes.

Authors:  B R Morton
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  A methodological bias toward overestimation of molecular evolutionary time scales.

Authors:  Francisco Rodriguez-Trelles; Rosa Tarrio; Francisco J Ayala
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-06-11       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  HIV sequence databases.

Authors:  Carla Kuiken; Bette Korber; Robert W Shafer
Journal:  AIDS Rev       Date:  2003 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.500

Review 4.  Genomic biodiversity, phylogenetics and coevolution in proteins.

Authors:  David D Pollock
Journal:  Appl Bioinformatics       Date:  2002

5.  Estimating the frequency of events that cause multiple-nucleotide changes.

Authors:  Simon Whelan; Nick Goldman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Evolution and comparative genomics of odorant- and pheromone-associated genes in rodents.

Authors:  Richard D Emes; Scott A Beatson; Chris P Ponting; Leo Goodstadt
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  Whole-genome sequencing and microarray analysis of ex vivo Plasmodium vivax reveal selective pressure on putative drug resistance genes.

Authors:  Neekesh V Dharia; A Taylor Bright; Scott J Westenberger; S Whitney Barnes; Serge Batalov; Kelli Kuhen; Rachel Borboa; Glenn C Federe; Colleen M McClean; Joseph M Vinetz; Victor Neyra; Alejandro Llanos-Cuentas; John W Barnwell; John R Walker; Elizabeth A Winzeler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Molecular evolution of the plant virus family Bromoviridae based on RNA3-encoded proteins.

Authors:  Francisco M Codoñer; José M Cuevas; Jesús A Sánchez-Navarro; Vicente Pallás; Santiago F Elena
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2005-10-06       Impact factor: 2.395

9.  The exchangeability of amino acids in proteins.

Authors:  Lev Y Yampolsky; Arlin Stoltzfus
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-06-08       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Comparative evolutionary genomics of androgen-binding protein genes.

Authors:  Richard D Emes; Matthew C Riley; Christina M Laukaitis; Leo Goodstadt; Robert C Karn; Chris P Ponting
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 9.043

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.