Literature DB >> 9864618

[Analysis of leg geometry--standard techniques and normal values].

P Keppler1, W Strecker, L Kinzl.   

Abstract

The diagnosis of malalignments of the lower extremities includes analysis of the geometry of the whole leg. The first step in the diagnostic process is a standardized physical examination. It provides valuable background information for an effective radiological diagnosis. Even with a thorough standardized physical examination it is not possible to define exactly the deformity or decide on an operative procedure. The diagnosis of axis deviations in the frontal plane can be measured on a conventional plain X-ray of the whole leg. In this view it is very important that the knee joints are in a true a.p. view independent on torsional deformities of the lower legs. Today the gold standard to measure the torsion and length of the lower extremities is the CT scan. However, the multitude of analytical methods for CT measurements described in the literature do not lend themselves readily to comparison; thus, it is difficult to identify a clear method of choice. Not every CT measurement is better than a physical examination. Evidence of reproducibility and accuracy is a prerequisite for useful interpretation of the results. Up to this point in the literature there are only reference values for the Ulm CT Method. One alternative is the MR scan, which avoids radiological risks, but the reproducibility and accuracy of the MRI method are not as good as for the CT method. Another alternative is ultrasound, where recent advances in the measurement of torsion and length of the lower extremities have proven competitive with or superior to the accuracy of MRI. The three-dimensional determination of the torsion and length of the lower extremities by ultrasound has now assumed a leading role in the non-radiological diagnosis of malalignments of the lower extremities in children and adolescents. This method furthermore is increasingly being used in preoperative planning of leg deformities in adults.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9864618     DOI: 10.1007/s001040050551

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chirurg        ISSN: 0009-4722            Impact factor:   0.955


  9 in total

1.  Length and angle measurements of the lower extremity in digital composite overview images.

Authors:  M Boewer; H Arndt; P A W Ostermann; J Petersein; S Mutze
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-05-26       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Compression nailing for posttraumatic rotational femoral deformities: open versus minimally invasive technique.

Authors:  Thomas Mückley; Christian Lerch; Oliver Gonschorek; Ivan Marintschev; Volker Bühren; Gunther O Hofmann
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2005-04-07       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  [Spectrum of indications for intramedullary or external fixators for axis correction and limb lengthening].

Authors:  F Schiedel; R Rödl
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  [Therapy of pediatric femoral fractures. Two versus three elastic stable intramedullary nails].

Authors:  A Semaan; T Klein; T M Boemers; M R Vahdad
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 5.  [Radiographic analysis of limb malalignment in the frontal plane].

Authors:  Kerstin Radtke; Barbara Gómez Dammeier; Sebastian Braun
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  [Post-traumatic torsional differences and functional tests following antegrade or retrograde intramedullary nailing of the distal femoral diaphysis].

Authors:  D G Maier; R Reisig; P Keppler; L Kinzl; F Gebhard
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.000

7.  Determining knee joint alignment using digital photographs.

Authors:  Holger Schmitt; Hannes Kappel; Michael T Moser; Eloy Cardenas-Montemayor; Karoly Engelleiter; Benita Kuni; Michael Clarius
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-06-13       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Does MIPO of fractures of the distal femur result in more rotational malalignment than ORIF? A retrospective study.

Authors:  M Lill; R Attal; A Rudisch; M C Wick; M Blauth; M Lutz
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 3.693

9.  The TransEurope FootRace Project: longitudinal data acquisition in a cluster randomized mobile MRI observational cohort study on 44 endurance runners at a 64-stage 4,486 km transcontinental ultramarathon.

Authors:  Uwe H W Schütz; Arno Schmidt-Trucksäss; Beat Knechtle; Jürgen Machann; Heike Wiedelbach; Martin Ehrhardt; Wolfgang Freund; Stefan Gröninger; Horst Brunner; Ingo Schulze; Hans-Jürgen Brambs; Christian Billich
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 8.775

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.