Literature DB >> 9862935

Damping in reflexively active and areflexive lengthening muscle evaluated with inertial loads.

D C Lin1, W Z Rymer.   

Abstract

Damping in reflexively active and areflexive lengthening muscle evaluated with inertial loads. J. Neurophysiol. 80: 3369-3372, 1998. Studies of active areflexive muscle have shown that during a constant velocity stretch the increment in force elicited by an incremental length change falls dramatically after a few hundred micrometers of stretch, a finding labeled as "muscle yield." The mechanical behavior after the yield was like a viscous damper, in that force varied only with velocity. In light of these observations, our aims were to determine whether viscous properties are also evident under more physiological conditions, specifically under inertial loading, and to evaluate the damping action of reflexively intact compared with that of deafferented muscle. The active soleus muscle in a decerebrate cat was forcibly stretched by a simulated inertia with a specified initial velocity. We compared muscle length changes when afferent pathways were intact with those recorded after cutting the dorsal roots. Our findings were that areflexive muscle showed highly damped responses, with large changes in mean muscle length, indicative of high viscosity relative to stiffness. In contrast, reflexively active muscle produced lightly damped oscillations, with minimal changes in mean length, reflecting low viscosity and high stiffness. It appears that the stretch reflect modifies the relative contributions of elastic and viscous-like forces, maintaining elasticity, which in turn sustains oscillations. These differences highlight tradeoffs between positional and velocity regulation, in that elastic properties of reflexively active muscle promote oscillations with modest change in mean muscle length, whereas viscous-like properties of areflexive muscle produce damped responses, with poor positional regulation.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9862935     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1998.80.6.3369

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  6 in total

1.  Experimental measure of arm stiffness during single reaching movements with a time-frequency analysis.

Authors:  Davide Piovesan; Alberto Pierobon; Paul DiZio; James R Lackner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  A simple experimentally based model using proprioceptive regulation of motor primitives captures adjusted trajectory formation in spinal frogs.

Authors:  William J Kargo; Arun Ramakrishnan; Corey B Hart; Lawrence C Rome; Simon F Giszter
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Elbow impedance during goal-directed movements.

Authors:  Florin Popescu; Joseph M Hidler; W Zev Rymer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-07-23       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Force enhancement by PEG during ramp stretches of skeletal muscle.

Authors:  Marc Chinn; Elise Burmeister Getz; Roger Cooke; Steven L Lehman
Journal:  J Muscle Res Cell Motil       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.698

Review 5.  Active Viscoelasticity of Sarcomeres.

Authors:  Khoi D Nguyen; Neelima Sharma; Madhusudhan Venkadesan
Journal:  Front Robot AI       Date:  2018-06-14

6.  Managing Vibration Training Safety by Using Knee Flexion Angle and Rating Perceived Exertion.

Authors:  Long-Ren Chuang; Wen-Wen Yang; Po-Ling Chang; Vincent Chiun-Fan Chen; Chiang Liu; Tzyy-Yuang Shiang
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-07       Impact factor: 3.576

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.