Literature DB >> 33500948

Active Viscoelasticity of Sarcomeres.

Khoi D Nguyen1, Neelima Sharma1, Madhusudhan Venkadesan1.   

Abstract

The perturbation response of muscle is important for the versatile, stable and agile control capabilities of animals. Muscle resists being stretched by developing forces in the passive tissues and in the active crossbridges. This review focuses on the active perturbation response of the sarcomere. The active response exhibits typical stress relaxation, and thus approximated by a Maxwell material that has a spring and dashpot arranged in series. The ratio of damping to stiffness in this approximation defines the relaxation timescale for dissipating stresses that are developed in the crossbridges due to external perturbations. Current understanding of sarcomeres suggests that stiffness varies nearly linearly with neural excitation, but not much is known about damping. But if both stiffness and damping have the same functional (linear or not) dependence on neural excitation, then the stress relaxation timescale cannot be varied depending on the demands of the task. This implies an unavoidable and biologically unrealistic trade-off between how freely the crossbridges can yield and dissipate stresses when stretched (injury avoidance in agile motions) vs. how long they can maintain perturbation-induced stresses and behave like a solid material (stiffness maintenance for stability). We hypothesize that muscle circumvents this trade-off by varying damping in a nonlinear manner with neural excitation, unlike stiffness that varies linearly. Testing this hypothesis requires new experimental and mathematical characterization of muscle mechanics, and also identifies new design goals for robotic actuators.
Copyright © 2018 Nguyen, Sharma and Venkadesan.

Entities:  

Keywords:  active perturbation response; dynamic modulus; muscle viscoelasticity; sarcomere mechanics; sinusoidal response; stress relaxation timescale; variable impedance

Year:  2018        PMID: 33500948      PMCID: PMC7805709          DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2018.00069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Robot AI        ISSN: 2296-9144


  56 in total

1.  Damping actions of the neuromuscular system with inertial loads: soleus muscle of the decerebrate cat.

Authors:  D C Lin; W Z Rymer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 2.  Eccentric muscle contractions: their contribution to injury, prevention, rehabilitation, and sport.

Authors:  Paul C LaStayo; John M Woolf; Michael D Lewek; Lynn Snyder-Mackler; Trude Reich; Stan L Lindstedt
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.751

Review 3.  Contribution of elastic tissues to the mechanics and energetics of muscle function during movement.

Authors:  Thomas J Roberts
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.312

4.  Neuromechanical response of musculo-skeletal structures in cockroaches during rapid running on rough terrain.

Authors:  S Sponberg; R J Full
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 5.  Design, fabrication and control of soft robots.

Authors:  Daniela Rus; Michael T Tolley
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Muscular contraction.

Authors:  A F Huxley
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1974-11       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Storage of elastic strain energy in muscle and other tissues.

Authors:  R M Alexander; H C Bennet-Clark
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1977-01-13       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Single myosin molecule mechanics: piconewton forces and nanometre steps.

Authors:  J T Finer; R M Simmons; J A Spudich
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1994-03-10       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  The cross-bridge spring: can cool muscles store elastic energy?

Authors:  N T George; T C Irving; C D Williams; T L Daniel
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Elastic energy storage in the shoulder and the evolution of high-speed throwing in Homo.

Authors:  Neil T Roach; Madhusudhan Venkadesan; Michael J Rainbow; Daniel E Lieberman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  1 in total

1.  Finger stability in precision grips.

Authors:  Neelima Sharma; Madhusudhan Venkadesan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 12.779

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.