Literature DB >> 9862578

Immunoradiometric and immunohistochemical analysis of Cathepsin D in ovarian cancer: lack of association with clinical outcome.

G Ferrandina1, G Scambia, A Fagotti, G D'Agostino, P Benedetti Panici, A Carbone, S Mancuso.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to analyse the clinical significance of Cathepsin D (Cath D) content as determined by an immunoradiometric assay in a series of primary untreated ovarian cancers from 162 patients. In addition, immunohistochemical analysis of Cath D was also performed on a subset of 86 tumours. Cath D levels were distributed in an asymmetrical way and were skewed towards the lower values (median value 20.8 pmol mg(-1) protein, range 2.0-99.0 pmol mg(-1) protein). No correlation was found between Cath D levels and clinicopathological parameters. However, the percentage of Cath D positivity was significantly higher in oestrogen receptor-positive (57%) compared with oestrogen receptor-negative (36%) cases (P= 0.01). The percentage of Cath D-positive staining was not significantly different for both epithelial (27%) and stromal components (40%). Immunoradiometrically detected Cath D levels were not different according to Cath D stromal immunostaining (P= 0.18), while higher Cath D levels were measured in Cath D-positive than in Cath D-negative tumour epithelial cells (P = 0.027). Survival analysis was conducted on 161 primary untreated ovarian cancer patients. The 5-year overall survival rate was 57% and 55% in Cath D-positive and Cath D-negative patients respectively (P = 0.69). As far as time to progression was concerned, there was no significant difference in the survival rate of patients with either high or low Cath D content (P = 0.56). Similar results have been obtained in the subset of patients in which Cath D was analysed by immunohistochemistry. In conclusion, Cath D measurement in tumour extracts appears to have a limited usefulness in improving the prognostic characterization of ovarian cancer patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9862578      PMCID: PMC2063229          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1998.737

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  25 in total

1.  Cathepsin D: an independent prognostic factor for metastasis of breast cancer.

Authors:  F Spyratos; T Maudelonde; J P Brouillet; M Brunet; A Defrenne; C Andrieu; K Hacene; A Desplaces; J Rouëssé; H Rochefort
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1989-11-11       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Autocrine growth stimulation of the MCF 7 breast cancer cells by the estrogen-regulated 52 K protein.

Authors:  F Vignon; F Capony; M Chambon; G Freiss; M Garcia; H Rochefort
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 4.736

3.  Use of avidin-biotin-peroxidase complex (ABC) in immunoperoxidase techniques: a comparison between ABC and unlabeled antibody (PAP) procedures.

Authors:  S M Hsu; L Raine; H Fanger
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 2.479

Review 4.  Estrogen-induced lysosomal proteases secreted by breast cancer cells: a role in carcinogenesis?

Authors:  H Rochefort; F Capony; M Garcia; V Cavaillès; G Freiss; M Chambon; M Morisset; F Vignon
Journal:  J Cell Biochem       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 4.429

5.  Evaluation of survival data and two new rank order statistics arising in its consideration.

Authors:  N Mantel
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Rep       Date:  1966-03

6.  Overexpression of transfected cathepsin D in transformed cells increases their malignant phenotype and metastatic potency.

Authors:  M Garcia; D Derocq; P Pujol; H Rochefort
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 9.867

7.  Biosynthesis and transport of lysosomal enzymes in human monocytes and macrophages. Effects of ammonium chloride, zymosan and tunicamycin.

Authors:  M Imort; M Zühlsdorf; U Feige; A Hasilik; K von Figura
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1983-09-15       Impact factor: 3.857

8.  Oestrogenic activity of tamoxifen and its metabolites on gene regulation and cell proliferation in MCF-7 breast cancer cells.

Authors:  M D Johnson; B R Westley; F E May
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Relationship between cathepsin-D content and disease-free survival in node-negative breast cancer patients: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  G Ferrandina; G Scambia; F Bardelli; P Benedetti Panici; S Mancuso; A Messori
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Cathepsin D assay in ovarian cancer: correlation with pathological features and receptors for oestrogen, progesterone and epidermal growth factor.

Authors:  G Scambia; P Benedetti; G Ferrandina; F Battaglia; G Baiocchi; S Mancuso
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Cathepsin D expression levels in nongynecological solid tumors: clinical and therapeutic implications.

Authors:  Gaetano Leto; Francesca M Tumminello; Marilena Crescimanno; Carla Flandina; Nicola Gebbia
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.150

Review 2.  The role of the tumor stroma in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Ben Davidson; Claes G Trope; Reuven Reich
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 3.  The Potential Role of the Proteases Cathepsin D and Cathepsin L in the Progression and Metastasis of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Md Zahidul Islam Pranjol; Nicholas Gutowski; Michael Hannemann; Jacqueline Whatmore
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2015-11-20
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.