Literature DB >> 9862575

Radiobiological prediction of normal tissue toxicities and tumour response in the radiotherapy of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

J M Singer1, P Price, R G Dale.   

Abstract

A number of randomized studies have been carried out in the UK and USA to determine the optimal radiotherapy dose schedule for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We have examined eight radiotherapy regimens from data taken from four randomized phase III studies carried out in the UK (1264 patients): 10 Gy single fraction; 17 Gy in two fractions over 8 days; 30 Gy in ten fractions over 14 days; 22.5 Gy in five fractions in 5 days; 27 Gy in six fractions over 11 days; 30 Gy in six fractions over 11 days; 36 Gy in 12 fractions over 16 days; and 39 Gy in 13 fractions over 17 days. We compared the clinical results in palliation, toxicity and survival with four regimens taken from one randomized study from the USA (365 patients): 40 Gy in 20 fractions over 4 weeks; 40 Gy 'split course' in ten fractions in 4 weeks; 50 Gy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks; and 60 Gy in 30 fractions over 6 weeks. Using the linear-quadratic (LQ) radiobiological model, we have calculated the radiobiological equivalent dose (BED) for acute-reacting tissues (BED10), late-reacting tissues (BED1.7) and tumour (BED25), and related the predicted response to the observed response in each tissue. There was a good correlation between the predicted response and the reported response in the case of late-reacting tissue toxicity and tumour response. The model confirmed that, in good performance status patients, a higher value for BED25 correlated with a higher degree of local control and survival and that radiotherapy regimens with a higher value for BED1.7 were associated with five cases of cord myelopathy, if the spinal cord was not shielded. In poor performance status patients the model suggested that the optimal regimen was a single fraction of 10 Gy because this resulted in an equivalent degree of symptom control as other regimens, needed only one hospital visit and was less likely to result in cord damage, thus, allowing for the possibility of retreatment at a later date.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9862575      PMCID: PMC2063234          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1998.734

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  8 in total

1.  A modelled comparison of the effects of using different ways to compensate for missed treatment days in radiotherapy.

Authors:  J H Hendry; S M Bentzen; R G Dale; J F Fowler; T E Wheldon; B Jones; A J Munro; N J Slevin; A G Robertson
Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.126

2.  Audit: the use of radiotherapy for NSCLC in the UK.

Authors:  E J Maher; A Timothy; C J Squire; A Goodman; S J Karp; C H Paine; R Ryall; G Read
Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.126

3.  Comments on Inadequacy of iridium implant as sole radiation treatment for operable breast cancer, Fentiman et al., Eur J Cancer 1996, 32A, pp. 608-611.

Authors:  R G Dale; B Jones; P Price
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 9.162

4.  Palliative radiotherapy for lung cancer: two versus five fractions.

Authors:  G J Rees; C E Devrell; V L Barley; H F Newman
Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.126

Review 5.  The linear-quadratic formula and progress in fractionated radiotherapy.

Authors:  J F Fowler
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 6.  Dose fractionation, dose rate and iso-effect relationships for normal tissue responses.

Authors:  G W Barendsen
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  A prospective randomized study of various irradiation doses and fractionation schedules in the treatment of inoperable non-oat-cell carcinoma of the lung. Preliminary report by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group.

Authors:  C A Perez; K Stanley; P Rubin; S Kramer; L Brady; R Perez-Tamayo; G S Brown; J Concannon; M Rotman; H G Seydel
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1980-06-01       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Radiation myelopathy: estimates of risk in 1048 patients in three randomized trials of palliative radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer. The Medical Research Council Lung Cancer Working Party.

Authors:  F R Macbeth; T E Wheldon; D J Girling; R J Stephens; D Machin; N M Bleehen; A Lamont; D J Radstone; N S Reed
Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.126

  8 in total
  3 in total

Review 1.  Palliative radiotherapy regimens for patients with thoracic symptoms from non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Rosemary Stevens; Fergus Macbeth; Elizabeth Toy; Bernadette Coles; Jason F Lester
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-01-14

2.  Preliminary results of proton-beam therapy for stage III non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Y Hatayama; T Nakamura; M Suzuki; Y Azami; T Ono; H Yamaguchi; Y Hayashi; I Tsukiyama; M Hareyama; Y Kikuchi; Y Takai
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 3.  Targeted and Off-Target (Bystander and Abscopal) Effects of Radiation Therapy: Redox Mechanisms and Risk/Benefit Analysis.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Pouget; Alexandros G Georgakilas; Jean-Luc Ravanat
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 8.401

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.