Literature DB >> 9862049

Potential use of FDG-PET scan after induction chemotherapy in surgically staged IIIa-N2 non-small-cell lung cancer: a prospective pilot study. The Leuven Lung Cancer Group.

J F Vansteenkiste1, S G Stroobants, P R De Leyn, P J Dupont, E K Verbeken.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clearance of viable tumour cells in mediastinal lymph nodes (MLN) by induction chemotherapy (IC)--so-called MLN downstaging--is an important aspect of combined-modality treatment of N2-NSCLC. Reassessment of MLN after IC by CT is far from accurate, while re-mediastinoscopy is often technically difficult. Based on our previous results with FDG-PET in the initial staging of N2 disease, we investigated whether PET after IC could be helpful in predicting MLN downstaging and therapeutic outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients underwent a first PET before IC. After three cycles of platinum-based IC, a second PET was performed before locoregional therapy, either surgery or radiotherapy. PET results were correlated with pathology of the MLN when available, and with survival.
RESULTS: Fifteen surgically staged N2-NSCLC patients were prospectively included. Locoregional therapy after IC consisted of surgery in nine and radiotherapy in six. Correlation with pathology of the nine resection specimens revealed that the accuracy of PET in predicting MLN downstaging was 100% (six true negatives; three true positives), whereas for CT it was only 67% (two false pos; one false neg). Reassessment with PET after IC was correlated with the outcome after the entire combined modality treatment. Survival was significantly better in patients with mediastinal clearance (P = 0.01) or with a greater than 50% decrease in the Standardised Uptake Value (SUV) of the primary tumour (P = 0.03) after IC.
CONCLUSIONS: Mediastinal PET after IC accurately assesses pathologic MLN downstaging in N2-NSCLC. The data suggest a possible correlation of early survival with mediastinal clearance and an important decrease of SUV in the primary tumour. Confirmation of these preliminary findings would establish PET as a useful non-invasive tool to select patients for intensive locoregional treatment after IC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9862049     DOI: 10.1023/a:1008437915860

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  14 in total

Review 1.  Computerized PET/CT image analysis in the evaluation of tumour response to therapy.

Authors:  W Lu; J Wang; H H Zhang
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  Positron Emission Tomography (PET) in Oncology.

Authors:  Andrea Gallamini; Colette Zwarthoed; Anna Borra
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 3.  Positron emission tomography/computerized tomography in lung cancer.

Authors:  Ilgin Sahiner; Gulin Ucmak Vural
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2014-06

4.  Adaptive Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Guided by (18)F-FDG PET in Resectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers: The NEOSCAN Trial.

Authors:  Jamie E Chaft; Mark Dunphy; Jarushka Naidoo; William D Travis; Matthew Hellmann; Kaitlin Woo; Robert Downey; Valerie Rusch; Michelle S Ginsberg; Christopher G Azzoli; Mark G Kris
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2015-12-25       Impact factor: 15.609

5.  [Correlation of histologic results with PET findings for tumor regression and survival in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer after neoadjuvant treatment].

Authors:  M Schmücking; R P Baum; R Bonnet; K Junker; K-M Müller
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.011

6.  Correlation of FDG-PET findings with histopathology in the assessment of response to induction chemoradiotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Yuka Yamamoto; Yoshihiro Nishiyama; Toshihide Monden; Yasuhiro Sasakawa; Motoomi Ohkawa; Masashi Gotoh; Kotaro Kameyama; Reiji Haba
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2005-10-12       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  [(18)F]FDG PET monitoring of tumour response to chemotherapy: does [(18)F]FDG uptake correlate with the viable tumour cell fraction?

Authors:  Karoline Spaepen; Sigrid Stroobants; Patrick Dupont; Guy Bormans; Jan Balzarini; Gregor Verhoef; Luc Mortelmans; Peter Vandenberghe; Christine De Wolf-Peeters
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-02-25       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 8.  From RECIST to PERCIST: Evolving Considerations for PET response criteria in solid tumors.

Authors:  Richard L Wahl; Heather Jacene; Yvette Kasamon; Martin A Lodge
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 9.  Positron emission tomography in lung cancer.

Authors:  Hiroaki Nomori; Yasuomi Ohba; Kentaro Yoshimoto; Hidekatsu Shibata; Kenji Shiraishi; Takeshi Mori
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2009-04-15

10.  Integrated FDG-PET/CT does not make invasive staging of the intrathoracic lymph nodes in non-small cell lung cancer redundant: a prospective study.

Authors:  K G Tournoy; S Maddens; R Gosselin; G Van Maele; J P van Meerbeeck; A Kelles
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 9.139

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.