Literature DB >> 9861622

Positron emission tomography with 18F-FDG to detect residual disease after therapy for malignant lymphoma.

U Cremerius1, U Fabry, J Neuerburg, M Zimny, R Osieka, U Buell.   

Abstract

We retrospectively evaluated the use of 18F-FDG PET for assessment of residual disease in 27 patients after therapy for malignant lymphoma. The images were evaluated qualitatively and quantitatively using standardized uptake values (SUV). All findings were validated either by biopsy or by clinical follow-up and compared with corresponding CT findings. The impact of blood glucose concentration, body weight, body surface area, lesion diameter and the time between injection and imaging on the SUVs were analysed. All 15 patients with biopsy-proven residual disease or relapse during follow-up and 11 of 12 patients who remained relapse-free were correctly identified by qualitative interpretation of the PET images. A case of pneumonitis after radiotherapy/chemotherapy accounted for the only false-positive finding. Compared with CT imaging, PET had a significantly higher specificity (P < 0.01), accuracy (P < 0.05) and positive predictive value (P < 0.05). The mean and maximum SUV of the tumour lesions were positively correlated to lesion diameter (P < 0.01) and imaging time post-injection (P < 0.01). Standardized uptake values corrected for the partial volume effect and normalized to a standardized imaging time (SUVBPT) were significantly higher (P < 0.05) in high-grade than in low-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. In conclusion, 18F-FDG PET may help in the identification of patients who need additional treatment after the completion of conventional therapy. Qualitative image interpretation appears sufficient for this purpose.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9861622     DOI: 10.1097/00006231-199811000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucl Med Commun        ISSN: 0143-3636            Impact factor:   1.690


  15 in total

1.  Role of FDG-PET/CT in management of Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Authors:  Arun Kumar Gupta; Devasenathipathy Kandasamy; Rachna Seth
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.967

Review 2.  Use of FDG-PET to monitor response to chemotherapy and radiotherapy in patients with lymphomas.

Authors:  N George Mikhaeel
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  18F-FDG PET/MRI in patients suffering from lymphoma: how much MRI information is really needed?

Authors:  Julian Kirchner; Cornelius Deuschl; Johannes Grueneisen; Ken Herrmann; Michael Forsting; Philipp Heusch; Gerald Antoch; Lale Umutlu
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-02-04       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 4.  PET and restaging of malignant lymphoma including residual masses and relapse.

Authors:  S N Reske
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-05-14       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 5.  Current role of FDG PET/CT in lymphoma.

Authors:  Lale Kostakoglu; Bruce D Cheson
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 6.  Positron emission tomography in lung cancer.

Authors:  Hiroaki Nomori; Yasuomi Ohba; Kentaro Yoshimoto; Hidekatsu Shibata; Kenji Shiraishi; Takeshi Mori
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2009-04-15

7.  Whole-body FDG-PET in patients with stage I non-seminomatous germ cell tumours.

Authors:  U Lassen; G Daugaard; A Eigtved; L Højgaard; K Damgaard; M Rørth
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-01-09       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  FDG-PET/CT in re-staging of patients with lymphoma.

Authors:  L S Freudenberg; G Antoch; P Schütt; T Beyer; W Jentzen; S P Müller; R Görges; M R Nowrousian; A Bockisch; J F Debatin
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-11-26       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 9.  18F-FDG PET/CT imaging in oncology.

Authors:  Ahmad Almuhaideb; Nikolaos Papathanasiou; Jamshed Bomanji
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.526

10.  Predictive role of positron emission tomography (PET) in the outcome of lymphoma patients.

Authors:  P L Zinzani; S Fanti; G Battista; M Tani; P Castellucci; V Stefoni; L Alinari; M Farsad; G Musuraca; A Gabriele; E Marchi; C Nanni; R Canini; N Monetti; M Baccarani
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-08-31       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.