Literature DB >> 24219404

Global estimates of the burden of injury and illness at work in 2012.

Jukka Takala1, Päivi Hämäläinen, Kaija Leena Saarela, Loke Yoke Yun, Kathiresan Manickam, Tan Wee Jin, Peggy Heng, Caleb Tjong, Lim Guan Kheng, Samuel Lim, Gan Siok Lin.   

Abstract

This article reviews the present indicators, trends, and recent solutions and strategies to tackle major global and country problems in safety and health at work. The article is based on the Yant Award Lecture of the American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA) at its 2013 Congress. We reviewed employment figures, mortality rates, occupational burden of disease and injuries, reported accidents, surveys on self-reported occupational illnesses and injuries, attributable fractions, national economic cost estimates of work-related injuries and ill health, and the most recent information on the problems from published papers, documents, and electronic data sources of international and regional organizations, in particular the International Labor Organization (ILO), World Health Organization (WHO), and European Union (EU), institutions, agencies, and public websites. We identified and analyzed successful solutions, programs, and strategies to reduce the work-related negative outcomes at various levels. Work-related illnesses that have a long latency period and are linked to ageing are clearly on the increase, while the number of occupational injuries has gone down in industrialized countries thanks to both better prevention and structural changes. We have estimated that globally there are 2.3 million deaths annually for reasons attributed to work. The biggest component is linked to work-related diseases, 2.0 million, and 0.3 million linked to occupational injuries. However, the division of these two factors varies depending on the level of development. In industrialized countries the share of deaths caused by occupational injuries and work-related communicable diseases is very low while non-communicable diseases are the overwhelming causes in those countries. Economic costs of work-related injury and illness vary between 1.8 and 6.0% of GDP in country estimates, the average being 4% according to the ILO. Singapore's economic costs were estimated to be equivalent to 3.2% of GDP based on a preliminary study. If economic losses would take into account involuntary early retirement then costs may be considerably higher, for example, in Finland up to 15% of GDP, while this estimate covers various disorders where work and working conditions may be just one factor of many or where work may aggravate the disease, injury, or disorders, such as traffic injuries, mental disorders, alcoholism, and genetically induced problems. Workplace health promotion, services, and safety and health management, however, may have a major preventive impact on those as well. Leadership and management at all levels, and engagement of workers are key issues in changing the workplace culture. Vision Zero is a useful concept and philosophy in gradually eliminating any harm at work. Legal and enforcement measures that themselves support companies and organizations need to be supplemented with economic justification and convincing arguments to reduce corner-cutting in risk management, and to avoid short- and long-term disabilities, premature retirement, and corporate closures due to mismanagement and poor and unsustainable work life. We consider that a new paradigm is needed where good work is not just considered a daily activity. We need to foster stable conditions and circumstances and sustainable work life where the objective is to maintain your health and work ability beyond the legal retirement age. We need safe and healthy work, for life.

Entities:  

Keywords:  burden of injury and illness at work; global estimates; mortality; occupational accidents; occupational exposures; work-related disease

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24219404      PMCID: PMC4003859          DOI: 10.1080/15459624.2013.863131

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg        ISSN: 1545-9624            Impact factor:   2.155


  14 in total

1.  International agency efforts to protect workers and the environment.

Authors:  J Takala
Journal:  Int J Occup Environ Health       Date:  1999 Jan-Mar

2.  Epidemiologic estimate of the proportion of fatalities related to occupational factors in Finland.

Authors:  M Nurminen; A Karjalainen
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.024

Review 3.  Review of estimates of the global burden of injury and illness due to occupational exposures.

Authors:  Timothy Driscoll; Jukka Takala; Kyle Steenland; Carlos Corvalan; Marilyn Fingerhut
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.214

4.  Global trend according to estimated number of occupational accidents and fatal work-related diseases at region and country level.

Authors:  Päivi Hämäläinen; Kaija Leena Saarela; Jukka Takala
Journal:  J Safety Res       Date:  2009-04-10

5.  Best estimate of the magnitude of mortality due to occupational exposure to hazardous substances.

Authors:  S Morrell; C Kerr; T Driscoll; R Taylor; G Salkeld; S Corbett
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 6.  Dying for work: The magnitude of US mortality from selected causes of death associated with occupation.

Authors:  Kyle Steenland; Carol Burnett; Nina Lalich; Elizabeth Ward; Joseph Hurrell
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.214

7.  Quantitative estimates of work-related death, disease and injury in New Zealand.

Authors:  Andrea 't Mannetje; Neil Pearce
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.024

8.  Global estimates of fatal work-related diseases.

Authors:  Päivi Hämäläinen; Jukka Takala; Kaija Leena Saarela
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.214

9.  Occupational cancer burden in Great Britain.

Authors:  Lesley Rushton; Sally J Hutchings; Lea Fortunato; Charlotte Young; Gareth S Evans; Terry Brown; Ruth Bevan; Rebecca Slack; Phillip Holmes; Sanjeev Bagga; John W Cherrie; Martie Van Tongeren
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Recent mortality from pleural mesothelioma, historical patterns of asbestos use, and adoption of bans: a global assessment.

Authors:  Kunihito Nishikawa; Ken Takahashi; Antti Karjalainen; Chi-Pang Wen; Sugio Furuya; Tsutomu Hoshuyama; Miwako Todoroki; Yoshifumi Kiyomoto; Donald Wilson; Toshiaki Higashi; Megu Ohtaki; Guowei Pan; Gregory Wagner
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2008-08-14       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  80 in total

1.  Factors Associated with Employer Support for Injured Workers During a Workers' Compensation Claim.

Authors:  Luke R Sheehan; Tyler J Lane; Shannon E Gray; Alex Collie
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2019-12

2.  How Does Perceived Fairness in the Workers' Compensation Claims Process Affect Mental Health Following a Workplace Injury?

Authors:  Christa Orchard; Nancy Carnide; Peter Smith
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2020-03

3.  An Approach to Assess the Burden of Work-Related Injury, Disease, and Distress.

Authors:  Paul A Schulte; Rene Pana-Cryan; Teresa Schnorr; Anita L Schill; Rebecca Guerin; Sarah Felknor; Gregory R Wagner
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 4.  The Effect of Self-Efficacy on Return-to-Work Outcomes for Workers with Psychological or Upper-Body Musculoskeletal Injuries: A Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Oliver Black; Tessa Keegel; Malcolm R Sim; Alexander Collie; Peter Smith
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2018-03

5.  Updating the Evidence on Functional Capacity Evaluation Methods: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Stijn De Baets; Patrick Calders; Noortje Schalley; Katrien Vermeulen; Sofie Vertriest; Lien Van Peteghem; Marieke Coussens; Fransiska Malfait; Guy Vanderstraeten; Geert Van Hove; Dominique Van de Velde
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2018-09

6.  A Healthy Public Cannot Abide Unhealthy And Unsafe Workplaces.

Authors:  Adam M Finkel
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  A psychosocial theory of sick leave put to the test in the European Working Conditions Survey 2010-2015.

Authors:  Diego Montano
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 3.015

8.  Recovery Within Injury Compensation Schemes: A System Mapping Study.

Authors:  Alex Collie; Sharon Newnam; Helen Keleher; Alan Petersen; Agnieszka Kosny; Adam P Vogel; Jason Thompson
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2019-03

9.  Occupational injuries: Global and local perspectives.

Authors:  Ayman El-Menyar; Ahammad Mekkodathi; Hassan Al-Thani
Journal:  Nepal J Epidemiol       Date:  2016-06-30

10.  Prevalence of Self-Reported Work-Related Injuries and Their Association with Psychological Symptoms in General Working Population of Taiwan.

Authors:  Pei-Hua Chung; Yawen Cheng
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2017-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.