Literature DB >> 9860332

Pudendal neuropathy is predictive of failure following anterior overlapping sphincteroplasty.

R Gilliland1, D F Altomare, H Moreira, L Oliveira, J E Gilliland, S D Wexner.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study assessed the efficacy of anterior overlapping sphincteroplasty and parameters predictive of a successful outcome.
METHODS: Clinical findings and physiologic investigations of female patients who underwent anterior overlapping sphincteroplasty for fecal incontinence between 1988 and 1996 were reviewed. The extent of sphincter damage was assessed at needle electromyography as the number of quadrants exhibiting decreased motor unit potentials. Prolonged pudendal nerve terminal motor latencies were those of greater than 2.2 ms. The size of the endoanal ultrasound defect was assessed as degrees circumference of the external sphincter in which viable muscle was absent. Patients were reviewed by telephone questionnaire and were asked to grade the outcome of their surgery as excellent or good (success) or fair or poor (failure). Incontinence was graded using a scoring system of 0 (perfect continence) to 20 (complete incontinence).
RESULTS: There were 100 patients who had an overlapping sphincteroplasty; complete follow-tip information was obtained for 77 patients at a median of 24 (range, 2-96) months. The median age was 47 (range, 25-80) years and they had a median duration of incontinence of four (range, 0.1-39) years. Prior sphincteroplasty had been performed in 30 patients with a median of one (range, 1-7) operations. Investigations performed included electromyography (n = 49), pudendal nerve terminal motor latency (n = 71), endoanal ultrasound (n = 49), and manometry (n = 67). Sixty percent of patients had improved continence and 42 (55 percent) considered their surgery to have been successful as attested to by a significant decrease in their incontinence score (from 15.1 +/- 4.5 to 4.3 +/- 4.2; P < 0.0001). Neither patient age, parity, prior sphincteroplasty, cause or duration of incontinence, extent of electromyography damage, size of the endoanal ultrasound defect, nor any manometric parameter correlated with outcome. However, 62 percent of 59 patients with bilaterally normal pudendal nerve terminal motor latencies had a successful outcome compared with only 16.7 percent of 12 patients with unilateral or bilateral prolonged pudendal nerve terminal motor latencies (P < 0.01).
CONCLUSION: Bilateral normal pudendal nerve terminal motor latencies are the only factors predictive of long-term success after overlapping sphincteroplasty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9860332     DOI: 10.1007/bf02237299

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  26 in total

1.  Sphincteroplasty for fecal incontinence in the era of sacral nerve modulation.

Authors:  Donato F Altomare; Michele De Fazio; Ramona Tiziana Giuliani; Giorgio Catalano; Filippa Cuccia
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-11-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Investigation and treatment of faecal incontinence.

Authors:  S Maslekar; A Gardiner; C Maklin; G S Duthie
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 3.  Treatment strategies in obstructed defecation and fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Marat Khaikin; Steven-D Wexner
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-05-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Fecal incontinence: a review.

Authors:  Nicolas Bellicini; Peter J Molloy; Phillip Caushaj; Pamelasue Kozlowski
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2007-05-23       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Transrectal ultrasound, manometry, and pudendal nerve terminal latency studies in the evaluation of sphincter injuries.

Authors:  Brooke Gurland; Tracy Hull
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2008-08

Review 6.  Fistulotomy or fistulectomy and primary sphincteroplasty for anal fistula (FIPS): a systematic review.

Authors:  C Ratto; F Litta; L Donisi; A Parello
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 7.  Diagnostic testing for fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Craig H Olson
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2014-09

8.  Translumbar and transsacral magnetic neurostimulation for the assessment of neuropathy in fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Satish S C Rao; Enrique Coss-Adame; Kasaya Tantiphlachiva; Ashok Attaluri; Jose Remes-Troche
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  Overlapping sphincteroplasty: is it the standard of care?

Authors:  Laura H Goetz; Ann C Lowry
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2005-02

10.  Evaluation of anal incontinence: minimal approach, maximal effectiveness.

Authors:  Harry T Papaconstantinou
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2005-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.