Literature DB >> 9858536

Mechanism of regulatory target selection by the SOX high-mobility-group domain proteins as revealed by comparison of SOX1/2/3 and SOX9.

Y Kamachi1, K S Cheah, H Kondoh.   

Abstract

SOX proteins bind similar DNA motifs through their high-mobility-group (HMG) domains, but their action is highly specific with respect to target genes and cell type. We investigated the mechanism of target selection by comparing SOX1/2/3, which activate delta-crystallin minimal enhancer DC5, with SOX9, which activates Col2a1 minimal enhancer COL2C2. These enhancers depend on both the SOX binding site and the binding site of a putative partner factor. The DC5 site was equally bound and bent by the HMG domains of SOX1/2 and SOX9. The activation domains of these SOX proteins mapped at the distal portions of the C-terminal domains were not cell specific and were independent of the partner factor. Chimeric proteins produced between SOX1 and SOX9 showed that to activate the DC5 enhancer, the C-terminal domain must be that of SOX1, although the HMG domains were replaceable. The SOX2-VP16 fusion protein, in which the activation domain of SOX2 was replaced by that of VP16, activated the DC5 enhancer still in a partner factor-dependent manner. The results argue that the proximal portion of the C-terminal domain of SOX1/2 specifically interacts with the partner factor, and this interaction determines the specificity of the SOX1/2 action. Essentially the same results were obtained in the converse experiments in which COL2C2 activation by SOX9 was analyzed, except that specificity of SOX9-partner factor interaction also involved the SOX9 HMG domain. The highly selective SOX-partner factor interactions presumably stabilize the DNA binding of the SOX proteins and provide the mechanism for regulatory target selection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9858536      PMCID: PMC83870          DOI: 10.1128/MCB.19.1.107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Biol        ISSN: 0270-7306            Impact factor:   4.272


  49 in total

Review 1.  Sox genes find their feet.

Authors:  L H Pevny; R Lovell-Badge
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 5.578

2.  DNA-binding properties of the HMG domain of the lymphoid-specific transcriptional regulator LEF-1.

Authors:  K Giese; A Amsterdam; R Grosschedl
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 3.  What determines the specificity of action of Drosophila homeodomain proteins?

Authors:  S Hayashi; M P Scott
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1990-11-30       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Parallel expression of Sox9 and Col2a1 in cells undergoing chondrogenesis.

Authors:  Q Zhao; H Eberspaecher; V Lefebvre; B De Crombrugghe
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.780

5.  SOX9 directly regulates the type-II collagen gene.

Authors:  D M Bell; K K Leung; S C Wheatley; L J Ng; S Zhou; K W Ling; M H Sham; P Koopman; P P Tam; K S Cheah
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 38.330

6.  Dynamic expression of chicken Sox2 and Sox3 genes in ectoderm induced to form neural tissue.

Authors:  M Rex; A Orme; D Uwanogho; K Tointon; P M Wigmore; P T Sharpe; P J Scotting
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 3.780

7.  Cell differentiation by interaction of two HMG-box proteins: Mat1-Mc activates M cell-specific genes in S.pombe by recruiting the ubiquitous transcription factor Ste11 to weak binding sites.

Authors:  S Kjaerulff; D Dooijes; H Clevers; O Nielsen
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1997-07-01       Impact factor: 11.598

8.  Expression of the Sox11 gene in mouse embryos suggests roles in neuronal maturation and epithelio-mesenchymal induction.

Authors:  M Hargrave; E Wright; J Kun; J Emery; L Cooper; P Koopman
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.780

9.  SOX9 binds DNA, activates transcription, and coexpresses with type II collagen during chondrogenesis in the mouse.

Authors:  L J Ng; S Wheatley; G E Muscat; J Conway-Campbell; J Bowles; E Wright; D M Bell; P P Tam; K S Cheah; P Koopman
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  1997-03-01       Impact factor: 3.582

10.  Preventing the loss of competence for neural induction: HGF/SF, L5 and Sox-2.

Authors:  A Streit; S Sockanathan; L Pérez; M Rex; P J Scotting; P T Sharpe; R Lovell-Badge; C D Stern
Journal:  Development       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 6.868

View more
  43 in total

1.  Identification of CtBP1 and CtBP2 as corepressors of zinc finger-homeodomain factor deltaEF1.

Authors:  T Furusawa; H Moribe; H Kondoh; Y Higashi
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  Relief of gene repression by torso RTK signaling: role of capicua in Drosophila terminal and dorsoventral patterning.

Authors:  G Jiménez; A Guichet; A Ephrussi; J Casanova
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2000-01-15       Impact factor: 11.361

3.  The glial transcription factor Sox10 binds to DNA both as monomer and dimer with different functional consequences.

Authors:  R I Peirano; M Wegner
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-08-15       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  SpSoxB1 serves an essential architectural function in the promoter SpAN, a tolloid/BMP1-related gene.

Authors:  A P Kenny; L M Angerer; R C Angerer
Journal:  Gene Expr       Date:  2001

5.  Pax6 and SOX2 form a co-DNA-binding partner complex that regulates initiation of lens development.

Authors:  Y Kamachi; M Uchikawa; A Tanouchi; R Sekido; H Kondoh
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2001-05-15       Impact factor: 11.361

6.  Adjacent DNA sequences modulate Sox9 transcriptional activation at paired Sox sites in three chondrocyte-specific enhancer elements.

Authors:  Laura C Bridgewater; Marlan D Walker; Gwen C Miller; Trevor A Ellison; L Daniel Holsinger; Jennifer L Potter; Todd L Jackson; Reuben K Chen; Vicki L Winkel; Zhaoping Zhang; Sandra McKinney; Benoit de Crombrugghe
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-03-01       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Mice null for sox18 are viable and display a mild coat defect.

Authors:  D Pennisi; J Bowles; A Nagy; G Muscat; P Koopman
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  Crystal structure of a POU/HMG/DNA ternary complex suggests differential assembly of Oct4 and Sox2 on two enhancers.

Authors:  Attila Reményi; Katharina Lins; L Johan Nissen; Rolland Reinbold; Hans R Schöler; Matthias Wilmanns
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2003-08-15       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 9.  Distinct roles of Sox5, Sox6, and Sox9 in different stages of chondrogenic differentiation.

Authors:  Toshiyuki Ikeda; Hiroshi Kawaguchi; Satoru Kamekura; Naoshi Ogata; Yoshiyuki Mori; Kozo Nakamura; Shiro Ikegawa; Ung-il Chung
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.626

10.  SOX2 is a dose-dependent regulator of retinal neural progenitor competence.

Authors:  Olena V Taranova; Scott T Magness; B Matthew Fagan; Yongqin Wu; Natalie Surzenko; Scott R Hutton; Larysa H Pevny
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2006-05-01       Impact factor: 11.361

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.