Literature DB >> 9857522

The effect of abdominal wall morphology on ultrasonic pulse distortion. Part II. Simulations.

T D Mast1, L M Hinkelman, M J Orr, R C Waag.   

Abstract

Wavefront propagation through the abdominal wall was simulated using a finite-difference time-domain implementation of the linearized wave propagation equations for a lossless, inhomogeneous, two-dimensional fluid as well as a simplified straight-ray model for a two-dimensional absorbing medium. Scanned images of six human abdominal wall cross sections provided the data for the propagation media in the simulations. The images were mapped into regions of fat, muscle, and connective tissue, each of which was assigned uniform sound speed, density, and absorption values. Propagation was simulated through each whole specimen as well as through each fat layer and muscle layer individually. Wavefronts computed by the finite-difference method contained arrival time, energy level, and wave shape distortion similar to that in measurements. Straight-ray simulations produced arrival time fluctuations similar to measurements but produced much smaller energy level fluctuations. These simulations confirm that both fat and muscle produce significant wavefront distortion and that distortion produced by fat sections differs from that produced by muscle sections. Spatial correlation of distortion with tissue composition suggests that most major arrival time fluctuations are caused by propagation through large-scale inhomogeneities such as fatty regions within muscle layers, while most amplitude and waveform variations are the result of scattering from smaller inhomogeneities such as septa within the subcutaneous fat. Additional finite-difference simulations performed using uniform-layer models of the abdominal wall indicate that wavefront distortion is primarily caused by tissue structures and inhomogeneities rather than by refraction at layer interfaces or by variations in layer thicknesses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9857522     DOI: 10.1121/1.423947

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  9 in total

1.  Statistical model of clutter suppression in tissue harmonic imaging.

Authors:  Xiang Yan; Mark F Hamilton
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Bilayer aberration-inducing gel phantom for high intensity focused ultrasound applications.

Authors:  Alex T Peek; Christopher Hunter; Wayne Kreider; Tatiana D Khokhlova; Pavel B Rosnitskiy; Petr V Yuldashev; Oleg A Sapozhnikov; Vera A Khokhlova
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Coherence-based quantification of acoustic clutter sources in medical ultrasound.

Authors:  James Long; Will Long; Nick Bottenus; Gregg Trahey
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Phase-Aberration Correction for HIFU Therapy Using a Multielement Array and Backscattering of Nonlinear Pulses.

Authors:  Gilles P L Thomas; Tatiana D Khokhlova; Christopher R Bawiec; Alex T Peek; Oleg A Sapozhnikov; Matthew O'Donnell; Vera A Khokhlova
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 2.725

5.  Robust and durable aberrative and absorptive phantom for therapeutic ultrasound applications.

Authors:  Alex T Peek; Gilles P L Thomas; Daniel F Leotta; Petr V Yuldashev; Vera A Khokhlova; Tatiana D Khokhlova
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-05       Impact factor: 2.482

Review 6.  Spatial Coherence in Medical Ultrasound: A Review.

Authors:  James Long; Gregg Trahey; Nick Bottenus
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Spatiotemporal Coherence to Quantify Sources of Image Degradation in Ultrasonic Imaging.

Authors:  Emelina P Vienneau; Kathryn A Ozgun; Brett C Byram
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 3.267

8.  On the Relationship between Spatial Coherence and In Situ Pressure for Abdominal Imaging.

Authors:  Bofeng Zhang; Gianmarco F Pinton; Kathryn R Nightingale
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  Quantifying the Effect of Abdominal Body Wall on In Situ Peak Rarefaction Pressure During Diagnostic Ultrasound Imaging.

Authors:  Bofeng Zhang; Gianmarco F Pinton; Yufeng Deng; Kathryn R Nightingale
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2021-03-13       Impact factor: 3.694

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.