Literature DB >> 9857511

Behavioral assessment of acoustic parameters relevant to signal recognition and preference in a vocal fish.

J R McKibben1, A H Bass.   

Abstract

Acoustic signal recognition depends on the receiver's processing of the physical attributes of a sound. This study takes advantage of the simple communication sounds produced by plainfin midshipman fish to examine effects of signal variation on call recognition and preference. Nesting male midshipman generate both long duration (> 1 min) sinusoidal-like "hums" and short duration "grunts." The hums of neighboring males often overlap, creating beat waveforms. Presentation of humlike, single tone stimuli, but not grunts or noise, elicited robust attraction (phonotaxis) by gravid females. In two-choice tests, females differentiated and chose between acoustic signals that differed in duration, frequency, amplitude, and fine temporal content. Frequency preferences were temperature dependent, in accord with the known temperature dependence of hum fundamental frequency. Concurrent hums were simulated with two-tone beat stimuli, either presented from a single speaker or produced more naturally by interference between adjacent sources. Whereas certain single-source beats reduced stimulus attractiveness, beats which resolved into unmodulated tones at their sources did not affect preference. These results demonstrate that phonotactic assessment of stimulus relevance can be applied in a teleost fish, and that multiple signal parameters can affect receiver response in a vertebrate with relatively simple communication signals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9857511     DOI: 10.1121/1.423938

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  31 in total

1.  Processing of auditory midbrain interspike intervals by model neurons.

Authors:  N R Wilson; D A Bodnar; J F Skovira; B R Land
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.621

2.  Seasonal plasticity of peripheral auditory frequency sensitivity.

Authors:  Joseph A Sisneros; Andrew H Bass
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-02-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Stimulus-dependent auditory tuning results in synchronous population coding of vocalizations in the songbird midbrain.

Authors:  Sarah M N Woolley; Patrick R Gill; Frédéric E Theunissen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Female reproductive state influences the auditory midbrain response.

Authors:  Jason A Miranda; Walter Wilczynski
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Reproductive and diurnal rhythms regulate vocal motor plasticity in a teleost fish.

Authors:  Tine K Rubow; Andrew H Bass
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.312

6.  Functional Segregation of Cortical Regions Underlying Speech Timing and Articulation.

Authors:  Michael A Long; Kalman A Katlowitz; Mario A Svirsky; Rachel C Clary; Tara McAllister Byun; Najib Majaj; Hiroyuki Oya; Matthew A Howard; Jeremy D W Greenlee
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  Seasonal plasticity of auditory hair cell frequency sensitivity correlates with plasma steroid levels in vocal fish.

Authors:  Kevin N Rohmann; Andrew H Bass
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 3.312

8.  Auditory evoked potentials of the plainfin midshipman fish (Porichthys notatus): implications for directional hearing.

Authors:  Andrew D Brown; Ruiyu Zeng; Joseph A Sisneros
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  Attention and Motivated Response to Simulated Male Advertisement Call Activates Forebrain Dopaminergic and Social Decision-Making Network Nuclei in Female Midshipman Fish.

Authors:  Paul M Forlano; Roshney R Licorish; Zachary N Ghahramani; Miky Timothy; Melissa Ferrari; William C Palmer; Joseph A Sisneros
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 3.326

10.  Manipulation of BK channel expression is sufficient to alter auditory hair cell thresholds in larval zebrafish.

Authors:  Kevin N Rohmann; Joel A Tripp; Rachel M Genova; Andrew H Bass
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 3.312

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.