Literature DB >> 9856707

A randomized study of combined spinal-epidural analgesia versus intravenous meperidine during labor: impact on cesarean delivery rate.

D R Gambling1, S K Sharma, S M Ramin, M J Lucas, K J Leveno, J Wiley, J E Sidawi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Combined spinal-epidural (CSE) analgesia produces rapid-onset pain relief and allows ambulation in early labor. Epidural local anesthetics may contribute to an increase in operative deliveries by decreasing perineal sensation and causing motor weakness. Operative delivery rates might be reduced with CSE, by avoiding or delaying administration of local anesthetics. This study compares the operative delivery rates associated with a CSE technique and those associated with intravenous meperidine for labor analgesia.
METHODS: Healthy parturients at full term were assigned randomly to receive CSE or intravenous meperidine analgesia. The CSE group received 10 microg intrathecal sufentanil, followed by epidural bupivacaine and fentanyl at their next request for analgesia. Parturients receiving intravenous meperidine had 50 mg on demand (maximum, 200 mg in 4 h). Labor and delivery outcomes in both groups were recorded and compared.
RESULTS: An intent-to-treat analysis of 1,223 women indicated that CSE does not increase the rate of cesarean delivery for dystocia in nulliparous and parous women (CSE, 3.5% vs. intravenous meperidine, 4; P=not significant) or in nulliparous women alone (CSE, 7% vs. intravenous meperidine, 8%; P=not significant). Profound fetal bradycardia that necessitated emergency cesarean delivery within 1 h of the time the mother received sufentanil occurred in 8 of 400 parturients (compared with 0 of 352 who received meperidine; P < 0.01). However, the method of fetal monitoring differed between the two groups. Despite this, neonatal outcomes were similar overall.
CONCLUSIONS: Combined spinal-epidural analgesia during labor does not increase the cesarean delivery rate for dystocia in healthy parturient patients at full term, regardless of parity. However, an unexpected increase in the number of cesarean deliveries for profound fetal bradycardia after intrathecal sufentanil was observed. Further investigation is warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9856707     DOI: 10.1097/00000542-199812000-00010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  17 in total

Review 1.  The epidural and intrathecal administration of somatotrophin-release inhibiting factor: native and synthetic analogues.

Authors:  D P Beltrutti; S Moessinger; G Varrassi
Journal:  Curr Rev Pain       Date:  2000

Review 2.  Intrathecal opioids for combined spinal-epidural analgesia during labour.

Authors:  Peter DeBalli; Terrance W Breen
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 3.  Rates of caesarean section and instrumental vaginal delivery in nulliparous women after low concentration epidural infusions or opioid analgesia: systematic review.

Authors:  E H C Liu; A T H Sia
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-05-28

Review 4.  Epidural analgesia for childbirth: effects of newer techniques on neonatal outcome.

Authors:  Giorgio Capogna; Michela Camorcia
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.022

5.  Intrapartum temperature elevation, epidural use, and adverse outcome in term infants.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Greenwell; Grace Wyshak; Steven A Ringer; Lise C Johnson; Michael J Rivkin; Ellice Lieberman
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2012-01-30       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 6.  Parenteral opioids for maternal pain relief in labour.

Authors:  Roz Ullman; Lesley A Smith; Ethel Burns; Rintaro Mori; Therese Dowswell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-09-08

7.  Factors affecting fetal bradycardia following combined spinal epidural for labor analgesia: a matched case-control study.

Authors:  Su Lin Maureen Cheng; Dianne Bautista; Serene Leo; Tiong Heng Alex Sia
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2012-10-13       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 8.  Neuraxial analgesia effects on labour progression: facts, fallacies, uncertainties and the future.

Authors:  E N Grant; W Tao; M Craig; D McIntire; K Leveno
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2014-08-04       Impact factor: 6.531

Review 9.  Effects of obstetric analgesics and anesthetics on the neonate : a review.

Authors:  Jay E Mattingly; John D'Alessio; Jaya Ramanathan
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.022

10.  Epidural analgesia during labor vs no analgesia: A comparative study.

Authors:  Wesam Farid Mousa; Roshdi Al-Metwalli; Manal Mostafa
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2012-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.