OBJECTIVES: To examine the association of intrapartum temperature elevation with adverse neonatal outcome among low-risk women receiving epidural analgesia and evaluate the association of epidural with adverse neonatal outcome without temperature elevation. METHODS: We studied all low-risk nulliparous women with singleton pregnancies ≥37 weeks delivering at our hospital during 2000, excluding pregnancies where infants had documented sepsis, meningitis, or a major congenital anomaly. Neonatal outcomes were compared between women receiving (n = 1538) and not receiving epidural analgesia (n = 363) in the absence of intrapartum temperature elevation (≤99.5°F) and according to the level of intrapartum temperature elevation within the group receiving epidural (n = 2784). Logistic regression was used to evaluate neonatal outcome while controlling for confounders. RESULTS: Maternal temperature >100.4°F developed during labor in 19.2% (535/2784) of women receiving epidural compared with 2.4% (10/425) not receiving epidural. In the absence of intrapartum temperature elevation (≤99.5°F), no significant differences were observed in adverse neonatal outcomes between women receiving and not receiving epidural. Among women receiving epidural, a significant linear trend was observed between maximum maternal temperature and all neonatal outcomes examined including hypotonia, assisted ventilation, 1- and 5-min Apgar scores <7, and early-onset seizures. In regression analyses, infants born to women with fever >101°F had a two- to sixfold increased risk of all adverse outcomes examined. CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of infants experiencing adverse outcomes increased with the degree of epidural-related maternal temperature elevation. Epidural use without temperature elevation was not associated with any of the adverse outcomes we studied.
OBJECTIVES: To examine the association of intrapartum temperature elevation with adverse neonatal outcome among low-risk women receiving epidural analgesia and evaluate the association of epidural with adverse neonatal outcome without temperature elevation. METHODS: We studied all low-risk nulliparous women with singleton pregnancies ≥37 weeks delivering at our hospital during 2000, excluding pregnancies where infants had documented sepsis, meningitis, or a major congenital anomaly. Neonatal outcomes were compared between women receiving (n = 1538) and not receiving epidural analgesia (n = 363) in the absence of intrapartum temperature elevation (≤99.5°F) and according to the level of intrapartum temperature elevation within the group receiving epidural (n = 2784). Logistic regression was used to evaluate neonatal outcome while controlling for confounders. RESULTS: Maternal temperature >100.4°F developed during labor in 19.2% (535/2784) of women receiving epidural compared with 2.4% (10/425) not receiving epidural. In the absence of intrapartum temperature elevation (≤99.5°F), no significant differences were observed in adverse neonatal outcomes between women receiving and not receiving epidural. Among women receiving epidural, a significant linear trend was observed between maximum maternal temperature and all neonatal outcomes examined including hypotonia, assisted ventilation, 1- and 5-min Apgar scores <7, and early-onset seizures. In regression analyses, infants born to women with fever >101°F had a two- to sixfold increased risk of all adverse outcomes examined. CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of infants experiencing adverse outcomes increased with the degree of epidural-related maternal temperature elevation. Epidural use without temperature elevation was not associated with any of the adverse outcomes we studied.
Authors: Yvonne W Wu; Gabriel J Escobar; Judith K Grether; Lisa A Croen; John D Greene; Thomas B Newman Journal: JAMA Date: 2003-11-26 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Roberto Romero; Jezid Miranda; Juan P Kusanovic; Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa; Piya Chaemsaithong; Alicia Martinez; Francesca Gotsch; Zhong Dong; Ahmed I Ahmed; Majid Shaman; Kia Lannaman; Bo Hyun Yoon; Sonia S Hassan; Chong J Kim; Steven J Korzeniewski; Lami Yeo; Yeon Mee Kim Journal: J Perinat Med Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 1.901
Authors: Roberto Romero; Piya Chaemsaithong; Nikolina Docheva; Steven J Korzeniewski; Adi L Tarca; Gaurav Bhatti; Zhonghui Xu; Juan P Kusanovic; Zhong Dong; Noppadol Chaiyasit; Ahmed I Ahmed; Bo Hyun Yoon; Sonia S Hassan; Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa; Lami Yeo Journal: J Perinat Med Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 1.901
Authors: Roberto Romero; Piya Chaemsaithong; Steven J Korzeniewski; Juan P Kusanovic; Nikolina Docheva; Alicia Martinez-Varea; Ahmed I Ahmed; Bo Hyun Yoon; Sonia S Hassan; Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa; Lami Yeo Journal: J Perinat Med Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 1.901
Authors: Roberto Romero; Piya Chaemsaithong; Nikolina Docheva; Steven J Korzeniewski; Adi L Tarca; Gaurav Bhatti; Zhonghui Xu; Juan P Kusanovic; Noppadol Chaiyasit; Zhong Dong; Bo Hyun Yoon; Sonia S Hassan; Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa; Lami Yeo; Yeon Mee Kim Journal: J Perinat Med Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 1.901