S Mehta1, H J Binns. 1. Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To examine the extent of parental knowledge about lead poisoning and its prevention and to determine characteristics associated with accurate lead knowledge. SETTING: Twenty-three pediatric practices and 1 family practice in Chicago, Ill, and its suburbs. METHODS: A 24-question test regarding lead poisoning and its prevention (Chicago Lead Knowledge Test) was developed based on lead specialists' review and parental test-retest reliability. One point was assigned for each correct response. It was self-administered by a sample of 2225 parents of 0- to 6-year-old children visiting study practices. A 1-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to determine the association of demographic descriptors with test scores. RESULTS: Respondents had a mean age of 33 years. Ninety percent were mothers, 49% were college graduates, and 80% were home owners. Fifteen percent lived in homes built before 1950, of which 36% were remodeled or renovated during the last 6 months. Respondents' youngest children were 80% white, 10% Hispanic, 5% African American, and 5% other. Ten percent received Medicaid and 86% had other medical insurance. Thirty-four percent recalled receipt of lead information from a health care provider, and 2.4% had had a child with a blood lead level of 0.48 micromol/L (10 microg/dL) or higher. The mean Chicago Lead Knowledge Test score was 12.2 (SD, 3.7). Questions related to lead exposure were more often answered correctly than those related to prevention and diet. In the ANOVA model, those who recalled receipt of lead information from a health care provider, college graduates, respondents aged 30 years or older, Hispanic respondents, and those living in homes built before 1950 had higher scores (all ANOVA P< or =.001). CONCLUSIONS: Parents do not have much knowledge of ways to prevent childhood lead poisoning. Information from a health care provider can aid parental knowledge. The Chicago Lead Knowledge Test is a new self-administered tool to help evaluate lead education programs.
OBJECTIVES: To examine the extent of parental knowledge about lead poisoning and its prevention and to determine characteristics associated with accurate lead knowledge. SETTING: Twenty-three pediatric practices and 1 family practice in Chicago, Ill, and its suburbs. METHODS: A 24-question test regarding lead poisoning and its prevention (Chicago Lead Knowledge Test) was developed based on lead specialists' review and parental test-retest reliability. One point was assigned for each correct response. It was self-administered by a sample of 2225 parents of 0- to 6-year-old children visiting study practices. A 1-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to determine the association of demographic descriptors with test scores. RESULTS: Respondents had a mean age of 33 years. Ninety percent were mothers, 49% were college graduates, and 80% were home owners. Fifteen percent lived in homes built before 1950, of which 36% were remodeled or renovated during the last 6 months. Respondents' youngest children were 80% white, 10% Hispanic, 5% African American, and 5% other. Ten percent received Medicaid and 86% had other medical insurance. Thirty-four percent recalled receipt of lead information from a health care provider, and 2.4% had had a child with a blood lead level of 0.48 micromol/L (10 microg/dL) or higher. The mean Chicago Lead Knowledge Test score was 12.2 (SD, 3.7). Questions related to lead exposure were more often answered correctly than those related to prevention and diet. In the ANOVA model, those who recalled receipt of lead information from a health care provider, college graduates, respondents aged 30 years or older, Hispanic respondents, and those living in homes built before 1950 had higher scores (all ANOVA P< or =.001). CONCLUSIONS: Parents do not have much knowledge of ways to prevent childhood lead poisoning. Information from a health care provider can aid parental knowledge. The Chicago Lead Knowledge Test is a new self-administered tool to help evaluate lead education programs.
Authors: Carla Campbell; Mary Tran; Edward Gracely; Naomi Starkey; Hans Kersten; Peter Palermo; Nancy Rothman; Laura Line; Tine Hansen-Turton Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2011 May-Jun Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: Harriet Okatch; Margaret Cherney; Brittany Mokshefsky; Madeline Kuon; Sarah Scheuring; Emily Ritchey; Jiayi Chen Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-06-27 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Margaret Cherney; Sarabeth Erdman; Madeline Kuon; Nicholas Shupin; Najeda Regis; Emma Fitzelle-Jones; Kylie Givler; Susan Baldrige; Harriet Okatch Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-01-14 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Maureen Y Lichtveld; Hannah H Covert; Mya Sherman; Arti Shankar; Jeffrey K Wickliffe; Cecilia S Alcala Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-10-28 Impact factor: 3.390