Literature DB >> 28210915

Determining Childhood Blood Lead Level Screening Compliance Among Physicians.

Amanda Haboush-Deloye1, Erika R Marquez2, Shawn L Gerstenberger3.   

Abstract

Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Programs throughout the U.S. have addressed childhood lead poisoning by implementing primary and secondary prevention efforts. While many programs have helped increase screening rates, in some states children under the age of six still have not been tested for lead. This study aims to identify the barriers to childhood blood lead testing and develop a strategy to increase the number of children tested. Clark County physicians who work with children six and under were surveyed about blood lead level (BLL) testing practices, particularly, adherence to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines, and parental compliance with orders to have their children tested to determine their blood lead levels. In addition, select in-person interviews were conducted with physicians who reported high parental compliance to identify best practices and barriers. Of the 77 physicians that provided data, 48% indicated they did not follow CDC guideline compared to 52% who follow guidelines. 18 of the 30 (or 60%) physicians reported more than 80% of parents complied with doctor recommended BLL testing. Twelve physicians identified cost, lack of insurance, and absence of symptomology as persistent barriers to lead screening. This study identified barriers to childhood lead screening including inadequate parental adherence to physician-ordered screenings and physician non-compliance with screening recommendations are two primary contributors. Addressing these issues could increase screening in children and reduce the risk of lead poisoning.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Childhood lead poisoning; Health care providers; Physician

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28210915     DOI: 10.1007/s10900-017-0317-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Community Health        ISSN: 0094-5145


  23 in total

Review 1.  Evidence of self-report bias in assessing adherence to guidelines.

Authors:  A S Adams; S B Soumerai; J Lomas; D Ross-Degnan
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.038

Review 2.  Atypical sources of childhood lead poisoning in the United States: a systematic review from 1966-2006.

Authors:  Emmanuel C Gorospe; Shawn L Gerstenberger
Journal:  Clin Toxicol (Phila)       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 4.467

3.  The Affordable Care Act...or Is It?

Authors:  Clifford B Saper
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 10.422

4.  The rise in health care coverage and affordability since health reform took effect: findings from the Commonwealth Fund Biennial Health Insurance Survey, 2014.

Authors:  Sara R Collins; Petra W Rasmussen; Michelle M Doty; Sophie Beutel
Journal:  Issue Brief (Commonw Fund)       Date:  2015-01

5.  Geographic maldistribution of primary care for children.

Authors:  Scott A Shipman; Jia Lan; Chiang-Hua Chang; David C Goodman
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2010-12-20       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  Lead exposure and the cognitive development of urban preschool children: the Cincinnati Lead Study cohort at age 4 years.

Authors:  K N Dietrich; P A Succop; O G Berger; P B Hammond; R L Bornschein
Journal:  Neurotoxicol Teratol       Date:  1991 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.763

7.  National estimates of blood lead levels: United States, 1976-1980: association with selected demographic and socioeconomic factors.

Authors:  K R Mahaffey; J L Annest; J Roberts; R S Murphy
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1982-09-02       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  What do parents know about lead poisoning? The Chicago Lead Knowledge Test. Pediatric Practice Research Group.

Authors:  S Mehta; H J Binns
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  1998-12

9.  Low-level environmental lead exposure in childhood and adult intellectual function: a follow-up study.

Authors:  Maitreyi Mazumdar; David C Bellinger; Matthew Gregas; Kathleen Abanilla; Janine Bacic; Herbert L Needleman
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 5.984

10.  Childhood lead poisoning: conservative estimates of the social and economic benefits of lead hazard control.

Authors:  Elise Gould
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  3 in total

1.  Child Blood Lead Testing Rates in Texas.

Authors:  Kathrynn Pounders; Deepti Agarwal; Calandra J Lindstadt; Brad Love; Anjum Khurshid
Journal:  Glob Pediatr Health       Date:  2020-06-15

2.  Insights into the Slow Uptake of Residential Lead Paint Remediation Funds: A Lancaster, Pennsylvania, Case Study.

Authors:  Margaret Cherney; Sarabeth Erdman; Madeline Kuon; Nicholas Shupin; Najeda Regis; Emma Fitzelle-Jones; Kylie Givler; Susan Baldrige; Harriet Okatch
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Increased Risk of Sub-Clinical Blood Lead Levels in the 20-County Metro Atlanta, Georgia Area-A Laboratory Surveillance-Based Study.

Authors:  Carmen M Dickinson-Copeland; Lilly Cheng Immergluck; Maria Britez; Fengxia Yan; Ruijin Geng; Mike Edelson; Salathiel R Kendrick-Allwood; Katarzyna Kordas
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 3.390

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.