Literature DB >> 9855579

Posterior vaginal prolapse and bowel function.

A M Weber1, M D Walters, L A Ballard, D L Booher, M R Piedmonte.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study's objectives were to describe symptoms related to bowel dysfunction in women with uterovaginal prolapse and to compare these symptoms according to extent of posterior vaginal prolapse. STUDY
DESIGN: One hundred forty-three women completed a questionnaire assessment of bowel function and underwent standardized physical examination according to the International Continence Society's system for grading uterovaginal prolapse.
RESULTS: The mean age was 59.2 years (SD 11.8 years); 78% of the women were postmenopausal. According to the furthest extent of posterior vaginal prolapse at point Bp, 22 (15.5%) were in stage 0, 46 (32.4%) were in stage I, 50 (35.2%) were in stage II, 23 (16.2%) were in stage III, and 1 (0.7%) was in stage IV. Ninety-two percent of women reported having bowel movements at least every other day. When asked whether straining was required for them to have a bowel movement, 38 (26.6%) reported never or rarely, 71 (49.6%) reported sometimes, 20 (14.0%) reported usually, and 14 (9.8%) reported always. When asked whether they ever needed to help stool come out by pushing with a finger in the vagina or rectum, 98 (69.0%) reported never or rarely, 30 (21.1%) reported sometimes, 8 (5.6%) reported usually, and 6 (4.2%) reported always. Twenty-three women (16.1%) had fecal incontinence, with 11 having loss of control of stool less often than once a month and 12 having it more often than once a month. When asked whether to rate how much they were bothered by their bowel function on a scale of 1 to 10, with 1 being not at all and 10 being extremely, 51.7% of women chose 1 to 4, 20.3% chose 5 to 7, and 28% chose >/=8. There were no clinically significant associations between any of the questions related to bowel function and severity of posterior vaginal prolapse.
CONCLUSION: Women with uterovaginal prolapse frequently have symptoms related to bowel dysfunction, but this is not associated with the severity of posterior vaginal prolapse.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9855579     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(98)70008-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  33 in total

1.  Structural position of the posterior vagina and pelvic floor in women with and without posterior vaginal prolapse.

Authors:  Christina Lewicky-Gaupp; Aisha Yousuf; Kindra A Larson; Dee E Fenner; John O L Delancey
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Clinical impact of bowel symptoms in women with pelvic floor disorders.

Authors:  José Ananias Vasconcelos Neto; Camila Teixeira Moreira Vasconcelos; Sthela Maria Murad Regadas; Leonardo Robson Pinheiro Sobreira Bezerra; Kathiane Augusto Lustosa; Sara Arcanjo Lino Karbage
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  The effect of posterior colporrhaphy on anorectal function.

Authors:  Anupreet Dua; Stephen Radley; Steven Brown; Swati Jha; Georgina Jones
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 4.  Posterior vaginal compartment prolapse and defecatory dysfunction: are they related?

Authors:  Cara L Grimes; Emily S Lukacz
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Anorectal symptoms before and after laparoscopic sacrocolpoperineopexy for pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Rajeev Ramanah; Marcos Ballester; Elisabeth Chereau; Charles Bui; Roman Rouzier; Emile Daraï
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  Anatomical outcome and quality of life following posterior vaginal wall prolapse repair using collagen xenograft.

Authors:  Daniel Altman; Annika López; Catharina Gustafsson; Christian Falconer; Johan Nordenstam; Jan Zetterström
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2005-04-05

7.  Posterior pelvic floor dysfunction: there is an immediate need to standardize terminology.

Authors:  Marco Soligo
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2007-04

8.  Sexual function in women after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Mahyar Azar; Sima Noohi; Shokoufeh Radfar; Mohammad Hadi Radfar
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2007-06-15

9.  Symptomatic and quality of life outcomes after site-specific fascial reattachment for pelvic organ prolapse repair.

Authors:  Abdalla M Fayyad; Emma Redhead; Noveen Awan; Maria Kyrgiou; Sanjeev Prashar; Simon R Hill
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2007-09-15

10.  Is there a pelvic organ prolapse threshold that predicts pelvic floor symptoms?

Authors:  Robert E Gutman; Daniel E Ford; Lieschen H Quiroz; Stuart H Shippey; Victoria L Handa
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 8.661

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.