Literature DB >> 9855238

Periosteum and bone marrow in bone lengthening: a DEXA quantitative evaluation in rabbits.

J M Guichet1, P Braillon, O Bodenreider, P Lascombes.   

Abstract

We quantitatively studied the role of periosteum and bone marrow-endosteum during lengthening in 18 growing rabbits, comparing four surgical procedures: 1) periosteum and bone marrow preservation, 2) periosteum preservation, bone marrow destruction, 3) periosteum destruction, bone marrow preservation, 4) periosteum and bone marrow destruction. An external fixator was set on one femur, the other serving as a control. Distraction began on day 5 and stopped on day 25 (0.25 mm/12 hours). On day 30, femora were harvested with a layer of muscle. Area, bone mineral content and density were measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Procedure 2 showed the highest increase in bone mineral content around the elongated callus (127%) compared to procedures: 1 (81%), 3 (25%) and 4 (-8%, i.e., resorption of bone ends). A statistically significant effect on bone formation was observed when preserving (vs. destroying): 1) periosteum, 2) bone marrow (effect observed only around the distraction gap), 3) periosteum and bone marrow in combination. Periosteum alone forms a larger callus, with more mineral content than bone marrow alone, and destruction of both results in the absence of bone formation around the distraction area. Careful preservation of periosteum is essential to bone healing. Formation of bone with a large mineral content does not require bone marrow preservation, but there is an interaction effect on healing between bone marrow and periosteum.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9855238     DOI: 10.3109/17453679808997792

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand        ISSN: 0001-6470


  8 in total

1.  Complications and functional, psychological outcomes of bilateral tibial lengthening over intramedullary nail: evidence from Vietnam.

Authors:  Luong Nguyen Van; Doan Le Van
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Quantitative assessment of mineralization in distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Sunit Hazra; Hae-Ryong Song; Sandeep Biswal; Suk-Ha Lee; Seok Hyun Lee; Ki-Mo Jang; Hitesh N Modi
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2008-04-24       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 3.  Cell sources for bone tissue engineering: insights from basic science.

Authors:  Céline Colnot
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 6.389

4.  Insufficient bone regenerate after intramedullary femoral lengthening: risk factors and classification system.

Authors:  Mohamed Kenawey; Christian Krettek; Emmanouil Liodakis; Rupert Meller; Stefan Hankemeier
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-04-02       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Axial deformity correction in children via distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Valentin Antoci; Craig M Ono; Valentin Antoci; Ellen M Raney
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-03-18       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Current concepts of leg lengthening.

Authors:  Carol C Hasler; Andreas H Krieg
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 1.548

7.  Deformity correction and extremity lengthening in the lower leg: comparison of clinical outcomes with two external surgical procedures.

Authors:  Eugen Reitenbach; Robert Rödl; Georg Gosheger; Björn Vogt; Frank Schiedel
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-11-24

8.  The Bone-Forming Properties of Periosteum-Derived Cells Differ Between Harvest Sites.

Authors:  Lisanne C Groeneveldt; Tim Herpelinck; Marina Maréchal; Constantinus Politis; Wilfred F J van IJcken; Danny Huylebroeck; Liesbet Geris; Eskeatnaf Mulugeta; Frank P Luyten
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2020-11-25
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.