Literature DB >> 9854099

Evaluation of the Abbott LCx Mycobacterium tuberculosis assay for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in human samples.

M G Garrino1, Y Glupczynski, J Degraux, H Nizet, M Delmée.   

Abstract

Seven hundred thirty-seven clinical samples from 460 patients were processed for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex by a semiautomated ligase chain reaction commercial assay, the LCx Mycobacterium tuberculosis Assay (LCx assay) from Abbott Laboratories. Results were compared to those of direct microscopy and standard microbiological culture. Of 26 patients (5.7%) with a culture positive for M. tuberculosis, 22 (84.6%) were found positive by the LCx assay. The sensitivity of the LCx assay was 98% for smear-positive samples and 27% for smear-negative samples. With an overall culture positivity rate for M. tuberculosis of 8.3% (61 of 737 samples) and after resolution of discrepant results according to clinical data, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the LCx assay were 78, 100, 95, and 98%, respectively, compared to 85, 100, 100, and 98%, respectively, for culture and 67, 99, 87, and 97%, respectively, for acid-fast staining. In conclusion, the LCx assay proved satisfactory and appears to be an easy-to-use 1-day test which must be used with standard culture methods but can considerably reduce diagnosis time versus culture. However, its clinical interest appears to be limited in our population with low mycobacterial prevalence because of its cost considering the small gain in sensitivity versus direct microscopy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9854099      PMCID: PMC84218     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  29 in total

1.  The resurgence of tuberculosis: is your laboratory ready?

Authors:  F C Tenover; J T Crawford; R E Huebner; L J Geiter; C R Horsburgh; R C Good
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Sensitivity of fluorochrome microscopy for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis versus nontuberculous mycobacteria.

Authors:  P W Wright; R J Wallace; N W Wright; B A Brown; D E Griffith
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Detection and identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis directly from sputum sediments by ligase chain reaction.

Authors:  D F Moore; J I Curry
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in clinical specimens by polymerase chain reaction and Gen-Probe Amplified Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Direct Test.

Authors:  C Abe; K Hirano; M Wada; Y Kazumi; M Takahashi; Y Fukasawa; T Yoshimura; C Miyagi; S Goto
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Detection and identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis directly from sputum sediments by amplification of rRNA.

Authors:  V Jonas; M J Alden; J I Curry; K Kamisango; C A Knott; R Lankford; J M Wolfe; D F Moore
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Evaluation of Gen-Probe Amplified Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Direct Test and PCR for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in clinical specimens.

Authors:  N Miller; S G Hernandez; T J Cleary
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in respiratory specimens by a target-amplified test system.

Authors:  G E Pfyffer; P Kissling; R Wirth; R Weber
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in clinical samples by two-step polymerase chain reaction and nonisotopic hybridization methods.

Authors:  R M Shawar; F A el-Zaatari; A Nataraj; J E Clarridge
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Comparison of Roche Cobas Amplicor Mycobacterium tuberculosis assay with in-house PCR and culture for detection of M. tuberculosis.

Authors:  B R Eing; A Becker; A Sohns; R Ringelmann
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Large-scale use of polymerase chain reaction for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in a routine mycobacteriology laboratory.

Authors:  J E Clarridge; R M Shawar; T M Shinnick; B B Plikaytis
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 5.948

View more
  6 in total

1.  Evaluation of the BDProbeTec ET system for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in pulmonary and extrapulmonary samples: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Gianna Mazzarelli; Laura Rindi; Paola Piccoli; Claudio Scarparo; Carlo Garzelli; Enrico Tortoli
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  Relevance of commercial amplification methods for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in clinical samples.

Authors:  Claudio Piersimoni; Claudio Scarparo
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  The ligase chain reaction as a primary screening tool for the detection of culture positive tuberculosis.

Authors:  T M O'Connor; S Sheehan; B Cryan; N Brennan; C P Bredin
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 9.139

4.  Is the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA by ligase chain reaction worth the cost: experiences from an inner London teaching hospital.

Authors:  N Shetty; M Shemko; J Holton; G M Scott
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Multicenter evaluation of the Abbott LCx Mycobacterium tuberculosis ligase chain reaction assay.

Authors:  R Lumb; K Davies; D Dawson; R Gibb; T Gottlieb; C Kershaw; K Kociuba; G Nimmo; N Sangster; M Worthington; I Bastian
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Commercial nucleic-acid amplification tests for diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in respiratory specimens: meta-analysis and meta-regression.

Authors:  Daphne I Ling; Laura L Flores; Lee W Riley; Madhukar Pai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-02-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.