Literature DB >> 9853884

The accuracy of single serum progesterone measurement in the diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy: a meta-analysis.

B W Mol1, J G Lijmer, W M Ankum, F van der Veen, P M Bossuyt.   

Abstract

Serum progesterone measurement has been advocated as a diagnostic tool in the non-invasive diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy. To assess the accuracy of a single serum progesterone measurement in the diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy, a meta-analysis was performed incorporating 26 studies evaluating the performance of single serum progesterone measurement in the diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy. A distinction was made in the diagnosis of pregnancy failure of any type versus viable intrauterine pregnancy and the diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy versus non-ectopic pregnancy. The reported sensitivity and specificity differed between the studies. Since there was a clear negative correlation between sensitivity and specificity, summary receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves could be estimated. The ROC curve for the diagnosis of pregnancy failure versus viable intrauterine pregnancy showed a good discriminative capacity. Single serum progesterone measurement could not discriminate between ectopic pregnancy and non-ectopic pregnancy. It is concluded that serum progesterone measurement can identify patients at risk for ectopic pregnancy, who need further evaluation, but its discriminative capacity is insufficient to diagnose ectopic pregnancy with certainty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9853884     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/13.11.3220

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  17 in total

1.  PURLs: is this pregnancy viable?

Authors:  Andrew H Slattengren; Shailendra Prasad; Sonia Oyola
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 0.493

2.  Predicting first trimester pregnancy outcome: derivation of a multiple marker test.

Authors:  Suneeta Senapati; Mary D Sammel; Samantha F Butts; Peter Takacs; Karine Chung; Kurt T Barnhart
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 3.  Sexually transmitted diseases and infertility.

Authors:  Danielle G Tsevat; Harold C Wiesenfeld; Caitlin Parks; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 4.  Diagnosis and treatment of ectopic pregnancy.

Authors:  Heather Murray; Hanadi Baakdah; Trevor Bardell; Togas Tulandi
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2005-10-11       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 5.  Biomarkers for ectopic pregnancy and pregnancy of unknown location.

Authors:  Suneeta Senapati; Kurt T Barnhart
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 6.  Serum biomarkers for detecting ectopic pregnancy.

Authors:  Mary E Rausch; Kurt T Barnhart
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.190

7.  The Values of CA-125, Progesterone, ß-HCG and Estradiol in the Early Prediction of Ectopic Pregnancy.

Authors:  Meena M Abdul-Hussein; Omar F Abdul-Rasheed; Hala Abdul Qadir Al-Moayed
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2012-03

8.  Pregnancy of unknown location: a consensus statement of nomenclature, definitions, and outcome.

Authors:  Kurt Barnhart; Norah M van Mello; Tom Bourne; Emma Kirk; Ben Van Calster; Cecilia Bottomley; Karine Chung; George Condous; Steven Goldstein; Petra J Hajenius; Ben Willem Mol; Thomas Molinaro; Katherine L O'Flynn O'Brien; Richard Husicka; Mary Sammel; Dirk Timmerman
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  The value of ratio of hCG, progesterone in local blood of pregnancy location versus venous blood in the diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy.

Authors:  Qi Lu; Yuhong Li; Hong Shi; Xiao Lang; Yudong Wang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-06-15

Review 10.  Serum markers in the diagnosis of tubal pregnancy.

Authors:  Fabio Roberto Cabar; Paula Beatriz Fettback; Pedro Paulo Pereira; Marcelo Zugaib
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.365

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.