Literature DB >> 9853859

A prospective study of multiple needle biopsies versus a single open biopsy for testicular sperm extraction in men with non-obstructive azoospermia.

U I Ezeh1, H D Moore, I D Cooke.   

Abstract

Little is known about the efficacy and the factors affecting the outcome of fine needle aspiration biopsy of the testis for sperm retrieval in azoospermic men with defective spermatogenesis. A prospective study was designed to compare the efficacy of needle and open (window) testicular biopsies for testicular epididymal sperm extraction (TESE) in 35 consecutive men with azoospermia due to defective spermatogenesis undergoing testicular biopsy for intracytoplasmic injection of oocytes. Each of the consecutive 35 patients underwent TESE using a 19 gauge butterfly needle followed by a window (1-1.5 cm-sized incision) testicular biopsy in the same procedure. The extraction of spermatozoa into culture medium was compared with the assessment of testicular biopsies by histology, the mode of biopsy (needle or open biopsy) and the amount of tissue retrieved by either method. Testicular spermatozoa were retrieved in 22 (63%) who had an open testicular biopsy compared with five (14%) patients who had multiple needle biopsies, respectively; the difference was statistically significant. Open testicular biopsy retrieves more testicular tissue than needle biopsy. Needle testicular biopsy retrieved testicular spermatozoa in 50% of those with hypospermatogenesis, 10% with focal spermatogenesis and in no patients with maturation arrest or Sertoli cell-only pattern. In contrast, sperm retrieval was successful in 100%, 90% and 66% of those with respective histologies using open testicular biopsy. Other than bruising, for which they required no analgesia, none of the patients suffered any obvious complications associated with traditional testicular biopsy. We conclude that open testicular biopsy is more effective than needle biopsy for the retrieval of testicular spermatozoa in azoospermic men with defective spermatogenesis. The difference observed may be related to the amount of testicular tissue retrieved and to the influence of testicular histology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9853859     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/13.11.3075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  28 in total

Review 1.  Surgical recovery of sperm in non-obstructive azoospermia.

Authors:  Tomomoto Ishikawa
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2011-11-28       Impact factor: 3.285

2.  Sperm recovery prediction in azoospermic patients using Doppler ultrasonography.

Authors:  C A B Souza; J S L Cunha-Filho; P Fagundes; F M Freitas; E P Passos
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  Sperm retrieval, fertilization, and pregnancy outcome in repeated testicular sperm aspiration.

Authors:  G Westlander; B Rosenlund; B Söderlund; M Wood; C Bergh
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 4.  Management of non-obstructive azoospermia.

Authors:  Koji Chiba; Noritoshi Enatsu; Masato Fujisawa
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2016-01-18

Review 5.  The development of surgical sperm extraction and new challenges to improve the outcome.

Authors:  Noritoshi Enatsu; Koji Chiba; Masato Fujisawa
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2015-11-27

6.  Initial experiences of a testicular sperm extraction programme for assisted reproduction in Ireland.

Authors:  S Jacob; H Spillane; D Keane; K Waite; G McSorley; R F Harrison
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2000 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.568

7.  Testicular tissue histology in rabbit testes after transparenchymal suturing with six different types of suture material.

Authors:  M Murat Samli; Murat Demirbas; Cem Guler; Fatma Aktepe
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 8.  Microdissection testicular sperm extraction: an update.

Authors:  Ali A Dabaja; Peter N Schlegel
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 3.285

9.  Members of the CDY family have different expression patterns: CDY1 transcripts have the best correlation with complete spermatogenesis.

Authors:  Sandra E Kleiman; Leah Yogev; Ron Hauser; Amnon Botchan; Batia Bar-Shira Maymon; Letizia Schreiber; Gedalia Paz; Haim Yavetz
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2003-09-03       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 10.  Techniques for surgical retrieval of sperm prior to intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) for azoospermia.

Authors:  A Van Peperstraten; M L Proctor; N P Johnson; G Philipson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-04-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.