Literature DB >> 29259430

The development of surgical sperm extraction and new challenges to improve the outcome.

Noritoshi Enatsu1, Koji Chiba1, Masato Fujisawa1.   

Abstract

Surgical sperm extraction with intracytoplasmic sperm injection has become widespread worldwide and is regarded as the sole option for patients with azoospermia. However, the sperm retrieval rate remains unsatisfactorily low, particularly for men with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA). Therefore, the technical challenges associated with improving the sperm retrieval rate for men with NOA are being addressed. The most successful method developed to date is microdissection testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE), which is rapidly becoming recognized as a useful technique due to its relatively high sperm retrieval rate and low complication rate. However, even with micro-TESE, the sperm retrieval rate for men with NOA remains at 30-60 %, with an even lower birth rate. The technical challenges associated with improving the outcomes of surgical sperm extraction are being approached through the use of ultrasound and optimal surgical devices such as narrow band imaging, multiphoton microscopy, and optical coherent tomography. In addition to the difficulties related to searching for sperm, medical treatments that induce spermatogenesis remain controversial. For example, varicocele repair prior to surgical sperm extraction and hormonal therapy before and after TESE have been extensively examined. We herein briefly summarized the development process in surgical sperm extraction up to the present and technical challenges to improve the outcomes of surgical sperm extraction.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Intracytoplasmic sperm injection; Male infertility; Surgical sperm extraction; Testicular sperm aspiration; Testicular sperm extraction

Year:  2015        PMID: 29259430      PMCID: PMC5715855          DOI: 10.1007/s12522-015-0228-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Med Biol        ISSN: 1445-5781


  76 in total

1.  Fine needle aspiration vs. mTESE in non-obstructive azoospermia.

Authors:  S El-Haggar; T Mostafa; T Abdel Nasser; R Hany; A Abdel Hadi
Journal:  Int J Androl       Date:  2008-12

2.  Pregnancies after testicular sperm extraction and intracytoplasmic sperm injection in non-obstructive azoospermia.

Authors:  P Devroey; J Liu; Z Nagy; A Goossens; H Tournaye; M Camus; A Van Steirteghem; S Silber
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  Assessment of Time-dependent Changes in Semen Parameters in Infertile Men After Microsurgical Varicocelectomy.

Authors:  Teruo Fukuda; Hideaki Miyake; Noritoshi Enatsu; Kei Matsushita; Masato Fujisawa
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  Frequency of azoospermia.

Authors:  G M Willott
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  1982 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.395

5.  Testicular sperm retrieval by percutaneous fine needle sperm aspiration compared with testicular sperm extraction by open biopsy in men with non-obstructive azoospermia.

Authors:  S Friedler; A Raziel; D Strassburger; Y Soffer; D Komarovsky; R Ron-El
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  Pregnancies after intracytoplasmic injection of sperm collected by fine needle biopsy of the testis.

Authors:  H Bourne; W Watkins; A Speirs; H W Baker
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Evaluation of the azoospermic patient.

Authors:  J P Jarow; M A Espeland; L I Lipshultz
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  A new power Doppler ultrasound guiding technique for improved testicular sperm extraction.

Authors:  Joseph Har-Toov; Osnat Eytan; Ron Hauser; Haim Yavetz; David Elad; Ariel J Jaffa
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  Testicular needle biopsy, open biopsy, epididymal aspiration and intracytoplasmic sperm injection in obstructive azoospermia.

Authors:  O Hovatta; J Moilanen; K von Smitten; I Reima
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 6.918

10.  Clinical comparison of conventional testicular sperm extraction and microdissection techniques for non-obstructive azoospermia.

Authors:  Ibrahim Fathi Ghalayini; Mohammed A Al-Ghazo; Osama Bani Hani; Rami Al-Azab; Ibrahim Bani-Hani; Faheem Zayed; Yazan Haddad
Journal:  J Clin Med Res       Date:  2011-05-19
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Two Decades from the Introduction of Microdissection Testicular Sperm Extraction: How This Surgical Technique Has Improved the Management of NOA.

Authors:  Nahid Punjani; Caroline Kang; Peter N Schlegel
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 4.241

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.