BACKGROUND: The relationship between lactose-maldigestion, self-reported milk intolerance and gastrointestinal symptoms has not been clearly defined. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate: a) the prevalence of lactose maldigestion and lactose intolerance in a sample of the general population taken from a rural center; b) the frequency of self-reported milk-intolerance and its correlation with lactose-maldigestion; c) the influence of lactose maldigestion, lactose intolerance and self-reported milk intolerance on dietary habits and consumption of total calories, protein, and calcium. SUBJECTS: We studied a randomized sample of the general population in a small center in Sicily. 323 subjects (150 males, 173 females), age range 5 to 85 years (median 44) were included and underwent H2-breath test after 25 g lactose load. The preliminary dietary investigation spanned 7 consecutive days using a printed dietary form and was under the daily control of a team of dietitians. METHODS: The dietary investigation was completed in the first part of the study and the results were analyzed for nutrient composition by a computerized database. The subjects were then divided into self-reported milk-intolerants and self-reported milk-tolerants and they underwent H2 breath testing; subjects with H2 concentration >20 ppm over the baseline concentration were considered maldigesters and those with one or more symptoms were classified as intolerants. RESULTS: 104/323 subjects (32.2%) were lactose maldigesters but tolerants, while 13/323 (4%) were lactose maldigesters and intolerants. In each age-class group (pediatric, adult, and elderly subjects) only the lactose maldigester and intolerant subjects showed differences in nutrient intake with a significantly lower daily consumption of milk and a lower calcium intake. 49/323 subjects were self-reported milk-intolerants; of these, 26 (53%) were lactose maldigesters but tolerants, 18 (37%) were lactose digesters and tolerants and only 5 (10%) were lactose maldigesters and intolerants. In the whole group of self-reported milk-intolerants, dietary milk consumption was significantly reduced and calcium intake was lower than in all the other subjects studied (320 mg/day vs. 585 mg/day, p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In studies of the general population, the frequency of lactose intolerance is much lower than that of lactose maldigestion. Gastrointestinal symptoms after lactose load in self-reported milk-intolerants are found in only a very low number of these subjects. Furthermore, in these subjects we observed an unnecessary reduction in milk consumption and an insufficient dietary calcium intake.
BACKGROUND: The relationship between lactose-maldigestion, self-reported milk intolerance and gastrointestinal symptoms has not been clearly defined. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate: a) the prevalence of lactose maldigestion and lactose intolerance in a sample of the general population taken from a rural center; b) the frequency of self-reported milk-intolerance and its correlation with lactose-maldigestion; c) the influence of lactose maldigestion, lactose intolerance and self-reported milk intolerance on dietary habits and consumption of total calories, protein, and calcium. SUBJECTS: We studied a randomized sample of the general population in a small center in Sicily. 323 subjects (150 males, 173 females), age range 5 to 85 years (median 44) were included and underwent H2-breath test after 25 g lactose load. The preliminary dietary investigation spanned 7 consecutive days using a printed dietary form and was under the daily control of a team of dietitians. METHODS: The dietary investigation was completed in the first part of the study and the results were analyzed for nutrient composition by a computerized database. The subjects were then divided into self-reported milk-intolerants and self-reported milk-tolerants and they underwent H2 breath testing; subjects with H2 concentration >20 ppm over the baseline concentration were considered maldigesters and those with one or more symptoms were classified as intolerants. RESULTS: 104/323 subjects (32.2%) were lactose maldigesters but tolerants, while 13/323 (4%) were lactose maldigesters and intolerants. In each age-class group (pediatric, adult, and elderly subjects) only the lactose maldigester and intolerant subjects showed differences in nutrient intake with a significantly lower daily consumption of milk and a lower calcium intake. 49/323 subjects were self-reported milk-intolerants; of these, 26 (53%) were lactose maldigesters but tolerants, 18 (37%) were lactose digesters and tolerants and only 5 (10%) were lactose maldigesters and intolerants. In the whole group of self-reported milk-intolerants, dietary milk consumption was significantly reduced and calcium intake was lower than in all the other subjects studied (320 mg/day vs. 585 mg/day, p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In studies of the general population, the frequency of lactose intolerance is much lower than that of lactose maldigestion. Gastrointestinal symptoms after lactose load in self-reported milk-intolerants are found in only a very low number of these subjects. Furthermore, in these subjects we observed an unnecessary reduction in milk consumption and an insufficient dietary calcium intake.
Authors: Sari R Anthoni; Heli A Rasinperä; Antti J Kotamies; Hanna A Komu; Harri K Pihlajamäki; Kaija Leena Kolho; Irma E Järvelä Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2007-02-28 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: H Rasinperä; C Forsblom; N S Enattah; P Halonen; K Salo; M Victorzon; J-P Mecklin; H Järvinen; S Enholm; G Sellick; H Alazzouzi; R Houlston; J Robinson; P-H Groop; I Tomlinson; S Schwartz; L A Aaltonen; I Järvelä Journal: Gut Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 23.059
Authors: Ann E Almazar; Joseph Y Chang; Joseph J Larson; Elizabeth J Atkinson; G Richard Locke; Nicholas J Talley; Yuri A Saito Journal: J Clin Gastroenterol Date: 2019-07 Impact factor: 3.062
Authors: Laura Costarelli; Robertina Giacconi; Marco Malavolta; Andrea Basso; Francesco Piacenza; MariLuisa DeMartiis; Elvio Giannandrea; Carlo Renieri; Franco Busco; Roberta Galeazzi; Eugenio Mocchegiani Journal: Age (Dordr) Date: 2014-04-26
Authors: K Bácsi; J P Kósa; A Lazáry; B Balla; H Horváth; A Kis; Z Nagy; I Takács; P Lakatos; G Speer Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2008-08-13 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: H Rasinperä; E Savilahti; N S Enattah; M Kuokkanen; N Tötterman; H Lindahl; I Järvelä; K-L Kolho Journal: Gut Date: 2004-11 Impact factor: 23.059
Authors: F Imtiaz; E Savilahti; A Sarnesto; D Trabzuni; K Al-Kahtani; I Kagevi; M S Rashed; B F Meyer; I Järvelä Journal: J Med Genet Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 6.318