Literature DB >> 9851953

Long-term prognostic value of exercise echocardiography compared with exercise 201Tl, ECG, and clinical variables in patients evaluated for coronary artery disease.

L I Olmos1, H Dakik, R Gordon, J K Dunn, M S Verani, M A Quiñones, W A Zoghbi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The accuracy of exercise echocardiography and 201Tl single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) is similar in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD). However, comparative data on long-term prognosis are lacking. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Clinical variables and exercise, echocardiographic, and 201Tl tomographic parameters were studied in 248 patients (age, 56+/-12 years [mean+/-SD]; 189 men) who underwent simultaneous treadmill exercise 201Tl SPECT and echocardiography. Follow-up was obtained in 225 patients (91%) at a mean of 3.7+/-2.0 years. A total of 64 cardiac events occurred. With the use of stepwise logistic regression, 4 models simulating clinical stress testing scenarios were evaluated in the prediction of all cardiac events, ischemic events, and/or cardiac death. The best clinical models were exercise echocardiography with exercise ECG and exercise 201Tl SPECT with exercise ECG. Both models were comparable in the prediction of cardiac events. For the exercise echocardiography model, exercise wall motion score index and induction of ischemia were the strongest predictors of events with ORs of 2.63 per unit increment (95% CI, 1. 34 to 5.17; P=0.005) and 4.1 (95% CI, 1.32 to 12.79; P=0.015), respectively. For the model with exercise 201Tl SPECT, the strongest predictor was ischemic perfusion defect (OR, 4.93; 95% CI, 1.72 to 14.08; P=0.003). The absence of ST changes during exercise decreased the risk of events. For the prediction of ischemic events and/or cardiac death, echocardiographic and 201Tl parameters were the only predictive variables.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients evaluated for CAD, exercise echocardiography and 201Tl combined with ECG variables provide comparable prognostic information and can be used interchangeably for risk stratification.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9851953     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.98.24.2679

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  27 in total

Review 1.  Stress echocardiography.

Authors:  Thomas H Marwick
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 2.  Prognostic value of gated myocardial perfusion SPECT.

Authors:  Leslee J Shaw; Ami E Iskandrian
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Assessing risk in acute chest pain: The value of stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients admitted through the emergency department.

Authors:  Faisal Nabi; Su Min Chang; Jiaqiong Xu; Elizabeth Gigliotti; John J Mahmarian
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 4.  Stress echocardiography for the diagnosis and risk stratification of patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease: a critical appraisal. Supported by the British Society of Echocardiography.

Authors:  R Senior; M Monaghan; H Becher; J Mayet; P Nihoyannopoulos
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  Detection of coronary artery disease using real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography: a comparison with dual-isotope resting thallium-201/stress technectium-99m sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography.

Authors:  Shoa-Lin Lin; Kuan-Rau Chiou; Wei-Chun Huang; Nan-Jing Peng; Daw-Guey Tsay; Chun-Peng Liu
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.037

6.  Treating the right patient at the right time: Access to echocardiography in Canada.

Authors:  B Munt; B J O'Neill; C Koilpillai; K Gin; J Jue; G Honos
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.223

7.  Implications of Abnormal Exercise Electrocardiography With Normal Stress Echocardiography.

Authors:  Melissa A Daubert; Joseph Sivak; Allison Dunning; Pamela S Douglas; Brian Coyne; Tracy Y Wang; Daniel B Mark; Eric J Velazquez
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 21.873

8.  Influence of arterial compliance on presence and extent of ischaemia during stress echocardiography.

Authors:  B A Haluska; K Matthys; R Fathi; E Rozis; S G Carlier; T H Marwick
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 9.  Stress echocardiography for the detection and assessment of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Nowell M Fine; Patricia A Pellikka
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 10.  The clinical role of stress myocardial perfusion imaging in women with suspected coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Jennifer H Mieres; David R Rosman; Leslee J Shaw
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.931

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.