Literature DB >> 9849098

Adult age differences in on-line contingency judgements.

W V Parr1, P Mercier.   

Abstract

This research was designed to further our understanding of age differences in contingency judgements and to consider the role of working memory in such judgements. Experiment 1 examined age differences in contingency judgement accuracy when information processing requirements were manipulated. Young and older adults estimated the degree of contingency between two categorical variables. Contingencies, amount of information, and speed of execution were varied. Participants discriminated the contingencies well. Judgement accuracy declined with smaller numbers of trials and shorter intertrial intervals. The judgement deterioration was more severe for older adults. In Experiment 2, speed interfered again more with the judgements made by older adults. Modulations of this effect occurred as a function of stimulus duration and distribution of event frequencies. Overall, the judgement deterioration is consistent with Wagner's (1981) model of automatic memory processing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9849098     DOI: 10.1037/h0087288

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol        ISSN: 1196-1961


  3 in total

1.  The role of contingency and contiguity in young and older adults' causal learning.

Authors:  Sharon A Mutter; Marci S DeCaro; Leslie F Plumlee
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 4.077

2.  Aging and retrospective revaluation of causal learning.

Authors:  Sharon A Mutter; Anthony R Atchley; Leslie M Plumlee
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2011-08-15       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Causal illusions in children when the outcome is frequent.

Authors:  María Manuela Moreno-Fernández; Fernando Blanco; Helena Matute
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.