T E Froehlich1, J T Robison, S K Inouye. 1. Department of Internal Medicine, Public Health, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate the Time and Change (T&C) test, a simple, standardized method for detecting dementia in a diverse older outpatient population with varying levels of education. DESIGN: A prospective cohort validation study. SETTING: Two outpatient clinics at an urban teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: The concurrent validation sample consisted of 100 consecutive outpatients 70 years of age or older who were 58% non-white and had a 16% dementia prevalence rate and educational levels ranging from 0 to 17+ years. Reliability was tested in a sample of 42 consecutive outpatients 75 years of age or older with a 36% dementia prevalence rate. MEASUREMENTS: T&C ratings were validated against a reference standard based on the Blessed Dementia Rating Scale and the Mini-Mental State Examination. Reliability, contribution to physician recognition of dementia, and ease of use were assessed. RESULTS: In the outpatient setting, the T&C had a sensitivity of 63%, specificity of 96%, a negative predictive value of 93%, a positive predictive value of 77%, and test-retest and inter-observer reliability agreement rates of 95% and 100%, respectively. When T&C results were added to the physician's documentation of dementia, the number of missed cases decreased from 44% to 19%, and the number of overcalled cases decreased by 100%. When timed cut points were added, the T&C test had a sensitivity of 94 to 100%, specificity of 37 to 46%, negative predictive value of 98 to 100%, positive predictive value of 23 to 25%, and test-retest and inter-observer agreement rates of 82% and 70 to 75%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The T&C test is a simple, accurate, reliable, performance-based tool that can improve physician ability to recognize dementia in diverse outpatient populations.
OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate the Time and Change (T&C) test, a simple, standardized method for detecting dementia in a diverse older outpatient population with varying levels of education. DESIGN: A prospective cohort validation study. SETTING: Two outpatient clinics at an urban teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: The concurrent validation sample consisted of 100 consecutive outpatients 70 years of age or older who were 58% non-white and had a 16% dementia prevalence rate and educational levels ranging from 0 to 17+ years. Reliability was tested in a sample of 42 consecutive outpatients 75 years of age or older with a 36% dementia prevalence rate. MEASUREMENTS: T&C ratings were validated against a reference standard based on the Blessed Dementia Rating Scale and the Mini-Mental State Examination. Reliability, contribution to physician recognition of dementia, and ease of use were assessed. RESULTS: In the outpatient setting, the T&C had a sensitivity of 63%, specificity of 96%, a negative predictive value of 93%, a positive predictive value of 77%, and test-retest and inter-observer reliability agreement rates of 95% and 100%, respectively. When T&C results were added to the physician's documentation of dementia, the number of missed cases decreased from 44% to 19%, and the number of overcalled cases decreased by 100%. When timed cut points were added, the T&C test had a sensitivity of 94 to 100%, specificity of 37 to 46%, negative predictive value of 98 to 100%, positive predictive value of 23 to 25%, and test-retest and inter-observer agreement rates of 82% and 70 to 75%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The T&C test is a simple, accurate, reliable, performance-based tool that can improve physician ability to recognize dementia in diverse outpatient populations.
Authors: Breda Cullen; Brian O'Neill; Jonathan J Evans; Robert F Coen; Brian A Lawlor Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 2006-12-18 Impact factor: 10.154
Authors: Franchesca Arias; Margaret Wiggins; Richard D Urman; Rebecca Armstrong; Kurt Pfeifer; Angela M Bader; David J Libon; Anita Chopra; Catherine C Price Journal: Perioper Care Oper Room Manag Date: 2020-01-25
Authors: Sharon K Inouye; Ying Zhang; Ling Han; Linda Leo-Summers; Richard Jones; Edward Marcantonio Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2006-09-11 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Cristobal Carnero-Pardo; Manuel Gurpegui; Emilio Sanchez-Cantalejo; Ana Frank; Santiago Mola; M Sagrario Barquero; M Teresa Montoro-Rios Journal: BMC Neurol Date: 2006-04-10 Impact factor: 2.474