Literature DB >> 984809

Susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria to 23 antimicrobial agents.

V L Sutter, S M Finegold.   

Abstract

The antimicrobial susceptibility of 492 anaerobic bacteria, the majority of which were recent clinical isolates, was determined by the agar dilution technique. Penicillin G was active against most of the strains tested at 32 U or less/ml, but only 72% of Bacteroides fragilis strains were susceptible at this level and 9% required 256 U or more/ml. Ampicillin was effective against most of the strains except B. fragilis at 16 mug or less/ml. Amoxicillin was active against only 31% of B. fragilis, 76% of other Bacteroides species, and 67% of Fusobacterium species at 8 mug/ml. Two new penicillins, mezlocillin and azlocillin, were similar to ampicillin in their activity. Carbenicillin and ticarcillin inhibited all but a few strains at 128 mug or less/ml. BLP 1654 was somewhat more active than penicillin G against B. fragilis but had similar activity against other anaerobes. Cephalothin was inactive against B. fragilis, and only 65% of other Bacteroides species were inhibited by 32 mug or less/ml. It was effective against all other anaerobes at that level. Cefamandole showed somewhat greater activity than cephalothin against B. fragilis but generally less activity against gram-positive organisms. Cefazaflur (SKF 59962) was comparable to cephalothin against B. fragilis. Cefoxitin was distinctly more active than cephalothin against B. fragilis. These latter two agents were less active than cephalothin against the gram-positive anaerobes. Chloramphenicol remains active against anaerobic bacteria at 16 mug or less/ml, with rare exceptions. Thiamphenicol was similar to chloramphenicol in its activity. Clindamycin was very active against most of the anaerobes at 8 mug or less/ml. Erythromycin and josamycin were also tested, with josamycin showing greater activity against B. fragilis than either erythromycin or clindamycin. A new oligosaccharide, everninomicin B, was less active than clindamycin against B. fragilis but more active against clostridia and some of the other strains tested. Most of the groups of bacteria tested demonstrated a trend toward resistance to tetracycline. Doxycycline and minocycline were somewhat more active than was tetracycline. Metronidazole was active against the majority of the anaerobes tested; resistance ws demonstrated by some of the gram-positive cocci and gram-positive, non-sporeforming bacilli.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1976        PMID: 984809      PMCID: PMC429823          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.10.4.736

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  41 in total

1.  Disk susceptibility testing of slow-growing anaerobic bacteria.

Authors:  Y Y Kwok; F P Tally; V L Sutter; S M Finegold
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1975-01       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Antimicrobial activity and human pharmacology of amoxicillin.

Authors:  H C Neu
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1974-06       Impact factor: 5.226

3.  The susceptibility of Bacteroides fragilis to 24 antibiotics.

Authors:  J W Kislak
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1972-03       Impact factor: 5.226

4.  In vitro effect of metronidazole and tinidazole on anaerobic bacteria.

Authors:  K Dornbusch; C E Nord
Journal:  Med Microbiol Immunol       Date:  1974       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Diagnosis and management of infections associated with immunosuppression. New antibiotics of potential importance for immunosuppressed patients.

Authors:  G P Bodey; V Rodriguez; N Horikoshi; M Valdivieso
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 1.066

6.  Antimicrobial susceptibilities of anaerobic bacteria: recent clinical isolates.

Authors:  J L Staneck; J A Washington
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1974-09       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  [Susceptibility of non-sporing anaerobes of the genera Bacteroides, Fusobacterium, Sphaerophorus, Peptococcus, and Peptostreptococcus to clindamycin (author's transl)].

Authors:  H Werner; G Böhm
Journal:  Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig A       Date:  1974

8.  Antibiotic susceptibility of the subspecies of Bacteroides fragilis.

Authors:  D J Blazevic
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Cefamandole, a cephalosporin antibiotic with an unusually wide spectrum of activity.

Authors:  H C Neu
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1974-08       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Susceptibility of Clostridium ramosum to antimicrobial agents.

Authors:  F P Tally; A Y Armfield; V R Dowell; Y Y Kwok; V L Sutter; S M Finegold
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1974-06       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  115 in total

1.  Susceptibilities of anaerobic bacteria isolated from animals with ovine foot rot to 28 antimicrobial agents.

Authors:  S Piriz; R Cuenca; J Valle; S Vadillo
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 2.  Current antimicrobial therapy of anaerobic infections.

Authors:  C V Sanders; K E Aldridge
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 3.  Antianaerobic antimicrobials: spectrum and susceptibility testing.

Authors:  Itzhak Brook; Hannah M Wexler; Ellie J C Goldstein
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 26.132

4.  Comparative in vitro activity of newer cephalosporins against anaerobic bacteria.

Authors:  A W Chow; D Bednorz
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Susceptibility testing of clinically isolated anaerobic bacteria by an agar dilution technique.

Authors:  W J Brown; P E Waatti
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1980-04       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Aerobic and anaerobic microbiology of surgical-site infection following spinal fusion.

Authors:  I Brook; E H Frazier
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Rapid identification of Bacteroides fragilis with bile and antibiotic disks.

Authors:  D L Draper; A L Barry
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1977-04       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Comparison of the activity of ionophores with other antibacterial agents against anaerobes.

Authors:  K Watanabe; J Watanabe; S Kuramitsu; H B Maruyama
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Diagnosis and therapy of anaerobic infections in childhood.

Authors:  R Roos; W Marget
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 3.553

10.  Pharmacokinetics of mezlocillin in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  T Bergan
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1978-12       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.