Literature DB >> 9847546

A partial matching theory of the mirror effect in immediate probed recognition.

D J Murray1, J Burhop, S Centa, N Chande, K Oinonen, T Thomas, T Wilkie, B Farahmand.   

Abstract

A set of experiments on immediate probed recognition of digit triples is reported in which the variables were list length (five, six, seven, or eight triples), the probability that a probe was old (.33, .5, or .67), and whether the digit triples were presented with an auditory component or articulatory suppression. Previous work had suggested that the false alarm (FA) rate in this paradigm was lower when auditory information was available than when it was not; this observation had led to the development of the partial matching theory of immediate probed recognition, according to which FAs could arise not only as a result of unlucky guesses but also when new probes shared a first digit in common with a partially retained target triple. It was argued that partial memory representations were less likely following auditory presentation than following articulatory suppression. Partial matching theory is contrasted with the rational response theory, according to which all FAs are unlucky guesses; partial matching theory gave a better account of the present experimental data than did rational response theory. However, a logical relationship between the two theories was suggested, a consequence of which was that rational response theory could be modified to include partial matching in such a way as to account for mirror effects, not only in unusually difficult immediate probed recognition tasks, but also in the more commonly studied mixed test list paradigm involving words of high or low frequency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9847546     DOI: 10.3758/bf03201195

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  16 in total

1.  A grouping interpretation of the modality effect in immediate probed recognition.

Authors:  D J Murray; N Boudreau; K K Burggraf; L Dobell; S L Guger; A Leask; L Stanford; T L Tate; M Wheeler
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-03

2.  Familiarity, memorability, and the effect of typicality on the recognition of faces.

Authors:  J R Vokey; J D Read
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1992-05

3.  Global matching models of recognition memory: How the models match the data.

Authors:  S E Clark; S D Gronlund
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1996-03

4.  J. Plateau: on the measurement of physical sensations and on the law which links the intensity of these sensations to the intensity of the source. J. Plateau: report on 'Psychophysical study: theoretical and experimental research on the measurement of sensations, particularly sensations of light and of fatigue' by Mr. Delboeuf. 1872.

Authors:  J Plateau; J Laming; D Lanimg
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1996

5.  A model for recognition memory: REM-retrieving effectively from memory.

Authors:  R M Shiffrin; M Steyvers
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1997-06

6.  The mirror effect in recognition memory: data and theory.

Authors:  M Glanzer; J K Adams
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Group aggregates and individual reliability: the case of verbal short-term memory.

Authors:  R H Logie; S Della Sala; M Laiacona; P Chalmers; V Wynn
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1996-05

8.  Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: applications to dementia and amnesia.

Authors:  J G Snodgrass; J Corwin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1988-03

9.  Reflections of the mirror effect for item and associative recognition.

Authors:  W E Hockley
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1994-11

10.  The mirror effect in recognition memory.

Authors:  M Glanzer; J K Adams
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1985-01
View more
  2 in total

1.  A grouping interpretation of the modality effect in immediate probed recognition.

Authors:  D J Murray; N Boudreau; K K Burggraf; L Dobell; S L Guger; A Leask; L Stanford; T L Tate; M Wheeler
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-03

2.  Ease of access to list items in short-term memory depends on the order of the recognition probes.

Authors:  Elke B Lange; John Cerella; Paul Verhaeghen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.051

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.