Literature DB >> 9847539

Independent reference frames in human spatial memory: body-centered and environment-centered coding in near and far space.

M E Woodin1, A Allport.   

Abstract

Our apparently seamless experience of the spatial environment seems to be derived from information coded across a variety of spatial reference frameworks, each tied to the metric of a different sensory or motor system. A fundamental distinction is that between body-centered and environment-centered reference frameworks. This study reports the first clear evidence of a behavioral dissociation between body-centered and environment-centered coding in human adults. Subjects, seated in a rotating chair with closed eyes, were required to point to remembered, auditorily presented target locations. The subjects were rotated between the presentation and recall of targets. Targets were held stationary with respect to either body-centered or environment-centered spatial coordinates. Prior to recall, subjects were required to point to a series of prelearned distractor locations, which also remained fixed with reference either to the subject's body or to the stationary environment. Memory for the target locations was selectively impaired when distractor locations were specified within the same spatial reference frame as the target, regardless of whether target and distractor locations were near to or distant from the subjects. In contrast, distractor locations specified in a different reference frame from that of the target had either little or no effect on memory for target locations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9847539     DOI: 10.3758/bf03201188

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  20 in total

1.  Selective reaching: evidence for action-centered attention.

Authors:  S P Tipper; C Lortie; G C Baylis
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  The representation of egocentric space in the posterior parietal cortex.

Authors:  J F Stein
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 12.579

3.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs.

Authors:  G R Loftus; M E Masson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1994-12

4.  Representation of visuomotor space in the parietal lobe of the monkey.

Authors:  M E Goldberg; C L Colby; J R Duhamel
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  1990

5.  Relation between cognitive and motor-oriented systems of visual position perception.

Authors:  B Bridgeman; S Lewis; G Heit; M Nagle
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Visual responses in the postarcuate cortex (area 6) of the monkey that are independent of eye position.

Authors:  M Gentilucci; C Scandolara; I N Pigarev; G Rizzolatti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  A bimodal map of space: somatosensory receptive fields in the macaque putamen with corresponding visual receptive fields.

Authors:  M S Graziano; C G Gross
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Left visuo-spatial neglect can be worse in far than in near space.

Authors:  A Cowey; M Small; S Ellis
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Role of structured visual field and visual reafference in accuracy of pointing movements.

Authors:  P Conti; D Beaubaton
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1980-02

10.  Left neglect for near but not far space in man.

Authors:  P W Halligan; J C Marshall
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-04-11       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Working memory as an emergent property of the mind and brain.

Authors:  B R Postle
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 3.590

2.  The selective disruption of spatial working memory by eye movements.

Authors:  Bradley R Postle; Christopher Idzikowski; Sergio Della Sala; Robert H Logie; Alan D Baddeley
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.143

3.  Spatial span under translation: a study of reference frames.

Authors:  S E Avons
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-04

4.  Spatial working memory activity of the caudate nucleus is sensitive to frame of reference.

Authors:  Bradley R Postle; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  Independent coding of target distance and direction in visuo-spatial working memory.

Authors:  S Chieffi; D A Allport
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1997

6.  Chunking in spatial memory.

Authors:  Jesse Sargent; Stephen Dopkins; John Philbeck; David Chichka
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Spatial memory during progressive disorientation.

Authors:  Jesse Sargent; Stephen Dopkins; John Philbeck; Reza Modarres
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Large manual pointing errors, but accurate verbal reports, for indications of target azimuth.

Authors:  John Philbeck; Jesse Sargent; Joeanna Arthur; Steve Dopkins
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.490

9.  Motor empathy is a consequence of misattribution of sensory information in observers.

Authors:  Indra T Mahayana; Michael J Banissy; Chiao-Yun Chen; Vincent Walsh; Chi-Hung Juan; Neil G Muggleton
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Can the Brain Be Relativistic?

Authors:  Reza Rastmanesh; Matti Pitkänen
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 4.677

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.