Literature DB >> 9847093

Quantitative control of inflorescence formation in impatiens balsamina

.   

Abstract

We analyzed the process of inflorescence formation in Impatiens balsamina by studying the architecture of the plant under different photoperiod treatments. Floral reversion under noninductive conditions in this species is caused by the lack of persistence of the induced state in the leaf. This can be used to control the amount of inductive signal and to examine its quantitative influence on morphological changes in the plant. The floral transition was characterized by a continuum of variation at the level of meristem identity, primordium initiation, and floral organ identity. This continuum was enhanced during reversion, suggesting that the establishment of a continuum partly reflects limiting amounts of inductive signal exported from the leaf to the meristem. The transcription patterns of two homologs of genes involved in the control of floral meristem identity, Imp-FLO and Imp-FIM, were similar in terminal and axillary flowers and may be associated with the continuum exhibited by I. balsamina. By analyzing the fate of axillary meristem primordia initiated before and after the beginning of the inductive period, we showed that de novo initiation of axillary meristem primordia by the evoked meristem is not required and that primordia initiated before evocation can adopt different fates, depending on the amount of inductive signal. The influence of age and/or position on primordium responsiveness to the inductive signal is discussed.

Entities:  

Year:  1998        PMID: 9847093      PMCID: PMC34735          DOI: 10.1104/pp.118.4.1191

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Physiol        ISSN: 0032-0889            Impact factor:   8.340


  21 in total

1.  LEAFY controls floral meristem identity in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  D Weigel; J Alvarez; D R Smyth; M F Yanofsky; E M Meyerowitz
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1992-05-29       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  floricaula: a homeotic gene required for flower development in antirrhinum majus.

Authors:  E S Coen; J M Romero; S Doyle; R Elliott; G Murphy; R Carpenter
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1990-12-21       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  Flowers into shoots: photo and hormonal control of a meristem identity switch in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  J K Okamuro; B G den Boer; C Lotys-Prass; W Szeto; K D Jofuku
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-11-26       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  A LEAFY co-regulator encoded by UNUSUAL FLORAL ORGANS.

Authors:  I Lee; D S Wolfe; O Nilsson; D Weigel
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1997-02-01       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Control of inflorescence architecture in Antirrhinum.

Authors:  D Bradley; R Carpenter; L Copsey; C Vincent; S Rothstein; E Coen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-02-29       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Specification of chimeric flowering shoots in wild-type Arabidopsis.

Authors:  F D Hempel; L J Feldman
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 6.417

7.  Fimbriata controls flower development by mediating between meristem and organ identity genes.

Authors:  R Simon; R Carpenter; S Doyle; E Coen
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1994-07-15       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  LEAFY Interacts with Floral Homeotic Genes to Regulate Arabidopsis Floral Development.

Authors:  E. Huala; I. M. Sussex
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 11.277

9.  Pathways for inflorescence and floral induction in Antirrhinum.

Authors:  D Bradley; C Vincent; R Carpenter; E Coen
Journal:  Development       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 6.868

10.  Transcription pattern of a FIM homologue in Impatiens during floral development and reversion.

Authors:  S Pouteau; D Nicholls; F Tooke; E Coen; N Battey
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 6.417

View more
  8 in total

1.  Phase identity of the maize leaf is determined after leaf initiation.

Authors:  J A Orkwiszewski; R S Poethig
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-09-12       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Floral initiation and inflorescence architecture: a comparative view.

Authors:  Reyes Benlloch; Ana Berbel; Antonio Serrano-Mislata; Francisco Madueño
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2007-08-06       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  An assessment of morphogenetic fluctuation during reproductive phase change in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Sylvie Pouteau; Catherine Albertini
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 4.357

4.  Down-regulation of TM29, a tomato SEPALLATA homolog, causes parthenocarpic fruit development and floral reversion.

Authors:  Charles Ampomah-Dwamena; Bret A Morris; Paul Sutherland; Bruce Veit; Jia-Long Yao
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 8.340

5.  A leaf-derived signal is a quantitative determinant of floral form in Impatiens.

Authors:  F Tooke; N H Battey
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 11.277

6.  Control of compound leaf development by FLORICAULA/LEAFY ortholog SINGLE LEAFLET1 in Medicago truncatula.

Authors:  Hongliang Wang; Jianghua Chen; Jiangqi Wen; Million Tadege; Guangming Li; Yu Liu; Kirankumar S Mysore; Pascal Ratet; Rujin Chen
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 8.340

7.  Harpin Hpa1 promotes flower development in Impatiens and Parochetus plants.

Authors:  Yilan Dong; Ping Li; Chunling Zhang
Journal:  Bot Stud       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 2.787

8.  A phylogenetically conserved APETALA2/ETHYLENE RESPONSE FACTOR, ERF12, regulates Arabidopsis floral development.

Authors:  J W Chandler; W Werr
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 4.076

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.