Literature DB >> 21367754

An assessment of morphogenetic fluctuation during reproductive phase change in Arabidopsis.

Sylvie Pouteau1, Catherine Albertini.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Reproductive phase change in Arabidopsis thaliana is characterized by two transitions in phytomer identity, the differentiation of the first elongate internode (bolting transition) and of the first flower (floral transition). An evaluation of the dynamics of these transitions was sought by examining the precision of the corresponding phytomer identity changes.
METHODS: The length of the first elongate internode and the frequency of chimeric inflorescence structures, e.g. paraclades not subtended by a leaf (no-leaf/paraclades) and flowers subtended by a bract (bract/flowers), were measured in the Wassilewskija (Ws) accession and 47 early flowering mutants under a wide range of photoperiods. The impact of photoperiodic perturbations applied to Ws plants at different times of development was also evaluated. KEY
RESULTS: In Ws, both types of characters were remarkably constant across photoperiods in spite of a high degree of interindividual variability. Bract/flowers were not normally produced in Ws, but they were observed in conditions that suggest enhanced light signalling, e.g. in response to continuous light perturbations and in mutants with reduced hypocotyl elongation. In contrast, no-leaf/paraclades were normally present in approx. 20 % of Ws plants, and their frequency was increased in conditions that suggest reduced light signalling, e.g. in mutants with altered specification of long-day responses. The length of the first elongate internode was unrelated to the rate of stem elongation and to the regulation of reproductive phase change.
CONCLUSIONS: Bract/flowers and no-leaf/paraclades corresponded to opposite effects on the floral transition that reflected different dynamics of progression to flowering. In contrast, the length of the first elongate internode was only indirectly related to the regulation of reproductive phase change and was mainly dependent on global morphogenetic constraints. This paper proposes that morphogenetic variability could be used to identify critical phases of development and characterize the canalization of developmental patterns.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21367754      PMCID: PMC3080622          DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcr039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Bot        ISSN: 0305-7364            Impact factor:   4.357


  49 in total

1.  Comparison of environmental and mutational variation in flowering time in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Sylvie Pouteau; Valérie Ferret; Delphine Lefebvre
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2006-11-16       Impact factor: 6.992

2.  Dynamics of vascular branching morphogenesis: the effect of blood and tissue flow.

Authors:  Thi-Hanh Nguyen; Anne Eichmann; Ferdinand Le Noble; Vincent Fleury
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2006-06-14

Review 3.  Regulation and identity of florigen: FLOWERING LOCUS T moves center stage.

Authors:  Franziska Turck; Fabio Fornara; George Coupland
Journal:  Annu Rev Plant Biol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 26.379

4.  Specification of chimeric flowering shoots in wild-type Arabidopsis.

Authors:  F D Hempel; L J Feldman
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 6.417

5.  Interactions among APETALA1, LEAFY, and TERMINAL FLOWER1 specify meristem fate.

Authors:  S J Liljegren; C Gustafson-Brown; A Pinyopich; G S Ditta; M F Yanofsky
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 11.277

Review 6.  Leaf-produced floral signals.

Authors:  Jan A D Zeevaart
Journal:  Curr Opin Plant Biol       Date:  2008-08-06       Impact factor: 7.834

7.  Regulation of the arabidopsis floral homeotic gene APETALA1.

Authors:  C Gustafson-Brown; B Savidge; M F Yanofsky
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1994-01-14       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  The significance of bolting and floral transitions as indicators of reproductive phase change in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Sylvie Pouteau; Catherine Albertini
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2009-06-05       Impact factor: 6.992

9.  The Arabidopsis TALE homeobox gene ATH1 controls floral competency through positive regulation of FLC.

Authors:  Marcel Proveniers; Bas Rutjens; Marco Brand; Sjef Smeekens
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 6.417

10.  The nature of floral signals in Arabidopsis. I. Photosynthesis and a far-red photoresponse independently regulate flowering by increasing expression of FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT).

Authors:  Rod W King; Tamotsu Hisamatsu; Eliezer E Goldschmidt; Cheryl Blundell
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2008-10-03       Impact factor: 6.992

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Floral meristem initiation and emergence in plants.

Authors:  J W Chandler
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 9.261

2.  Non-inductive conditions expose the cryptic bract of flower phytomeres in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Ralf Müller-Xing; Daniel Schubert; Justin Goodrich
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2015

3.  A phylogenetically conserved APETALA2/ETHYLENE RESPONSE FACTOR, ERF12, regulates Arabidopsis floral development.

Authors:  J W Chandler; W Werr
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 4.076

4.  Integrated dominance mechanisms regulate reproductive architecture in Arabidopsis thaliana and Brassica napus.

Authors:  Catriona H Walker; Cara D Wheeldon; Tom Bennett
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 8.340

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.