Literature DB >> 9844553

Differential effects of task complexity on contextual interference in a drawing task.

J M Albaret1, B Thon.   

Abstract

A large number of studies demonstrated the beneficial effects of contextual interference (CI) created by a random practice of different task variations during training on the retention and transfer of motor skills. Current interpretations of this phenomenon assume that random practice engages the subjects in deep and elaborate processing of movement related information, whereas blocked practice results in more superficial processing leading to poorer performance on later retention and transfer tests. According to this line of interpretation, we hypothesised that the complexity of the task to be learned could modulate the effects of CI. If the task is sufficiently complex, it could force the subjects to rely on such elaborate processing, and the beneficial effects of the intertask interference created by random practice could be obscured in that case. We tested this hypothesis by analysing the effects of practice schedule (random vs. blocked), on the acquisition, retention and transfer of learning in a drawing task where subjects had to reproduce accurately, without visual control, geometrical patterns presented on a video screen, as a function of task complexity defined by the number of segments (two, three or four) of each pattern. The results indicated a clear beneficial effect of random over blocked practice on delayed retention and transfer. However, this CI effect was only observed in subjects who learned the simplest movements, and was not observed in subjects who practised the more complex task. These results are discussed in terms of intratask interference created by the planning of multiple movements and the processing of knowledge of results (KR) when the number of drawing movements is increased. These findings support the assumption that the level of cognitive effort in which the subjects are engaged during training is a main factor influencing long-term retention and transfer of motor skills.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9844553     DOI: 10.1016/s0001-6918(98)00022-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)        ISSN: 0001-6918


  10 in total

Review 1.  Principles derived from the study of simple skills do not generalize to complex skill learning.

Authors:  Gabriele Wulf; Charles H Shea
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-06

2.  Changes in practice schedule and functional task difficulty: a study using the probe reaction time technique.

Authors:  Kazunori Akizuki; Yukari Ohashi
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2013-08-20

3.  No Overt Effects of a 6-Week Exergame Training on Sensorimotor and Cognitive Function in Older Adults. A Preliminary Investigation.

Authors:  Madeleine Ordnung; Maike Hoff; Elisabeth Kaminski; Arno Villringer; Patrick Ragert
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Challenge to promote change: both young and older adults benefit from contextual interference.

Authors:  Lisa Pauwels; Kathleen Vancleef; Stephan P Swinnen; Iseult A M Beets
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 5.750

5.  Contextual interference in complex bimanual skill learning leads to better skill persistence.

Authors:  Lisa Pauwels; Stephan P Swinnen; Iseult A M Beets
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of selected motor learning principles in physiotherapy and medical education.

Authors:  Martin Sattelmayer; Simone Elsig; Roger Hilfiker; Gillian Baer
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 2.463

Review 7.  Sleep and Motor Learning: Implications for Physical Rehabilitation After Stroke.

Authors:  Christel Gudberg; Heidi Johansen-Berg
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 4.003

8.  Transfer in Motor Sequence Learning: Effects of Practice Schedule and Sequence Context.

Authors:  Diana M Müssgens; Fredrik Ullén
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Additional Intra- or Inter-session Balance Tasks Do Not Interfere With the Learning of a Novel Balance Task.

Authors:  Louis-Solal Giboin; Markus Gruber; Andreas Kramer
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 4.566

10.  Interleaved practice benefits implicit sequence learning and transfer.

Authors:  Julia M Schorn; Barbara J Knowlton
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2021-04-01
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.