CONTEXT: Although blacks receive lower doses of hemodialysis than whites, their survival when receiving dialysis treatment is better than that for whites. Previous studies of the relationship between the dose of dialysis and patient survival have not controlled for differences in patient characteristics. OBJECTIVE: To examine the association of mortality with the dose of hemodialysis for clusters of patients categorized by race and sex. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of laboratory data and mortality outcomes from 1994, using a national database of hemodialysis patients. PATIENTS: A total of 18144 black and white patients receiving hemodialysis 3 times weekly who either lived the entire year receiving hemodialysis or died. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The fractional reduction of urea in a single dialysis session as the measured hemodialysis dose (urea reduction ratio [URR]) after controlling for race, sex, age, and diabetes mellitus. Mortality was determined by strata of URRs and albumin and creatinine levels. RESULTS: Across all age categories, blacks had lower URRs than whites, and men had lower URRs than women. In an age-adjusted model for evaluating interactions among URRs, race, sex, and diabetes, the association of URR with mortality risk was weak among blacks, particularly black men. After adjustment for age and diabetes, death probability curves were most steep for white women with URR values less than 60%. The death probability curves were least steep for black men. There was no meaningful difference between death probability and albumin or creatinine concentration among the race by sex clusters. CONCLUSION: Using URR, the usual measure of hemodialysis dose, the assumption that the association between dialysis dose and survival is uniform across demographic groups appears incorrect. Comparisons of the quality of dialysis patient care should not rely on URR alone to predict patient survival.
CONTEXT: Although blacks receive lower doses of hemodialysis than whites, their survival when receiving dialysis treatment is better than that for whites. Previous studies of the relationship between the dose of dialysis and patient survival have not controlled for differences in patient characteristics. OBJECTIVE: To examine the association of mortality with the dose of hemodialysis for clusters of patients categorized by race and sex. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of laboratory data and mortality outcomes from 1994, using a national database of hemodialysis patients. PATIENTS: A total of 18144 black and white patients receiving hemodialysis 3 times weekly who either lived the entire year receiving hemodialysis or died. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The fractional reduction of urea in a single dialysis session as the measured hemodialysis dose (urea reduction ratio [URR]) after controlling for race, sex, age, and diabetes mellitus. Mortality was determined by strata of URRs and albumin and creatinine levels. RESULTS: Across all age categories, blacks had lower URRs than whites, and men had lower URRs than women. In an age-adjusted model for evaluating interactions among URRs, race, sex, and diabetes, the association of URR with mortality risk was weak among blacks, particularly black men. After adjustment for age and diabetes, death probability curves were most steep for white women with URR values less than 60%. The death probability curves were least steep for black men. There was no meaningful difference between death probability and albumin or creatinine concentration among the race by sex clusters. CONCLUSION: Using URR, the usual measure of hemodialysis dose, the assumption that the association between dialysis dose and survival is uniform across demographic groups appears incorrect. Comparisons of the quality of dialysis patient care should not rely on URR alone to predict patient survival.
Authors: Vishal S Vaidya; Sushrut S Waikar; Michael A Ferguson; Fitz B Collings; Kelsey Sunderland; Costas Gioules; Gary Bradwin; Roland Matsouaka; Rebecca A Betensky; Gary C Curhan; Joseph V Bonventre Journal: Clin Transl Sci Date: 2008-12 Impact factor: 4.689
Authors: Myles Wolf; Joseph Betancourt; Yuchiao Chang; Anand Shah; Ming Teng; Hector Tamez; Orlando Gutierrez; Carlos A Camargo; Michal Melamed; Keith Norris; Meir J Stampfer; Neil R Powe; Ravi Thadhani Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2008-04-09 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Paungpaga Lertdumrongluk; Elani Streja; Connie M Rhee; Jongha Park; Onyebuchi A Arah; Steven M Brunelli; Allen R Nissenson; Daniel Gillen; Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh Journal: Am J Nephrol Date: 2014-04-26 Impact factor: 3.754
Authors: Connie M Rhee; Paungpaga Lertdumrongluk; Elani Streja; Jongha Park; Hamid Moradi; Wei Ling Lau; Keith C Norris; Allen R Nissenson; Alpesh N Amin; Csaba P Kovesdy; Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh Journal: Am J Nephrol Date: 2014-02-15 Impact factor: 3.754
Authors: Bernadette A Thomas; Rudolph A Rodriguez; Edward J Boyko; Cassianne Robinson-Cohen; Annette L Fitzpatrick; Ann M O'Hare Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2013-04-11 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Guofen Yan; Keith C Norris; Alison J Yu; Jennie Z Ma; Tom Greene; Wei Yu; Alfred K Cheung Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2013-03-28 Impact factor: 8.237