| Literature DB >> 9841752 |
H J Bonjer1, E van der Harst, E W Steyerberg, W W de Herder, G Kazemier, R S Mohammedamin, H A Bruining.
Abstract
Conventional adrenalectomy requires relatively large incisions. To assess the value of retroperitoneal endoscopic adrenalectomy, a case-control study was performed comparing the endoscopic technique to conventional posterior adrenalectomy. All patients had adrenal tumors less than 7 cm in diameter. Endoscopic retroperitoneal adrenalectomy required more operative time (90 vs. 60 minutes, p < 0.0001) than the open approach but was associated with less blood loss (20 vs. 125 ml, p < 0.0001). Endoscopic adrenalectomy caused less pain postoperatively (p = 0.0005) and was associated with fewer complications (p = 0.035). The hospital stay was shorter after endoscopic adrenalectomy than after open adrenalectomy (p < 0.0001). In conclusion, we advocate endoscopic retroperitoneal adrenalectomy in patients with small adrenal tumors.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 1998 PMID: 9841752 DOI: 10.1007/s002689900553
Source DB: PubMed Journal: World J Surg ISSN: 0364-2313 Impact factor: 3.352