Literature DB >> 15205748

[The choice between transperitoneal and retroperitoneal adrenalectomy. A prospective study].

W Kneist1, G Vetter, P Kann, C Jaursch-Hancke, A Heintz, G Hommel, T Junginger.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the optimal surgical approach to endoscopic adrenalectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between March 1997 and February 2003, we performed 221 endoscopic adrenalectomies in 202 patients (right side 83, left side 100, bilateral 19), with an conversion rate of 2,5%. In 197 patients endoscopic adrenalectomy was carried out via retropertioneal approach 128 times and via transperitoneal approach 88 times.
RESULTS: Endoscopic adrenalectomy was performed in 98% of the total number patients. No statistically significant influence ( P=0.05) was found for the parameters intraoperative blood loss, rate of postoperative complications, or duration of hospitalization in regard to the procedure. The operative time and learning curve were significantly longer with the retroperitoneal approach. Multivariate analysis identified surgical approach, tumor size (5 cm), and body mass index (25) as independent factors for operative time.
CONCLUSION: The lateral transperitoneal approach is the optimal procedure for endoscopic adrenalectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15205748     DOI: 10.1007/s00104-004-0873-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chirurg        ISSN: 0009-4722            Impact factor:   0.955


  23 in total

1.  Posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy: lessons learned within five years.

Authors:  M K Walz; K Peitgen; M V Walz; R Hoermann; B Saller; R M Giebler; F Jockenhövel; T Philipp; C E Broelsch; F W Eigler; K Mann
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Laparoscopic adrenalectomy. A review of 30 initial cases.

Authors:  J Pujol; M Viladrich; A Rafecas; L Lladó; A García-Barrasa; J Figueras; E Jaurrieta
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Comparison of the transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approach.

Authors:  O Miyake; K Yoshimura; T Yoshioka; M Honda; Y Kokado; T Miki; A Okuyama
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  A posterior lumbar approach for retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy: assessment of surgical efficacy.

Authors:  S Baba; A Miyajima; A Uchida; H Asanuma; A Miyakawa; M Murai
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Comparison of three techniques for adrenalectomy.

Authors:  H J Bonjer; J F Lange; G Kazemier; W W de Herder; E W Steyerberg; H A Bruining
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 6.  [Laparoscopic adrenal gland surgery].

Authors:  C Nies; E Möbius; M Rothmund
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 0.955

7.  Laparoscopic adrenalectomy: the optimal surgical approach.

Authors:  E Kebebew; A E Siperstein; Q Y Duh
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 1.878

8.  Laparoscopic posterior adrenalectomy: technical considerations.

Authors:  A E Siperstein; E Berber; K L Engle; Q Y Duh; O H Clark
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2000-08

9.  Laparoscopic versus open posterior adrenalectomy: a case-control study of 100 patients.

Authors:  G B Thompson; C S Grant; J A van Heerden; R T Schlinkert; W F Young; D R Farley; D M Ilstrup
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.982

10.  Laparoscopic adrenalectomy: lessons learned from 100 consecutive procedures.

Authors:  M Gagner; A Pomp; B T Heniford; D Pharand; A Lacroix
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  1 in total

1.  Changing pattern of the intraoperative blood pressure during endoscopic adrenalectomy in patients with Conn's syndrome.

Authors:  I Gockel; A Heintz; R Kentner; C Werner; C Wetner; Th Junginger
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-09-29       Impact factor: 4.584

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.