Literature DB >> 9835409

Visual size processing in spatial neglect.

A D Milner1, M Harvey, C L Pritchard.   

Abstract

Evidence from the use of the landmark task and from two size-matching tasks shows that many patients with left-sided neglect systematically under-perceive visual extent in leftward parts of space. This perceptual distortion of size serves to explain the occurrence of rightward line-bisection errors in most neglect patients. One possibility is that attentional biases of a chronic nature might underlie these perceptual changes seen in neglect patients. But contrary to this idea, we have found that attentional cueing in the landmark task causes changes in neglect patients exactly opposite to those seen in healthy subjects. The distortions of size perception seen in neglect could instead be caused by a high-level alteration of visual processing rather than by an attentional bias. In order to explore which visual stream of cortical processing might be compromised in such a disorder, we have begun to examine neglect patients on visuomotor as well as perceptual tasks. We have found clear evidence in one patient for intact grip scaling for object size in the neglected half of space, despite gross perceptual underestimations of the same objects. This result suggests that neglect can occur without major disruption of the dorsal stream, and may result instead from damage to a cortical system whose predominant visual input comes from the ventral stream.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9835409     DOI: 10.1007/s002210050561

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  7 in total

1.  Ocular scanning and perceptual size distortion in hemispatial neglect: effects of prism adaptation and sequential stimulus presentation.

Authors:  H Chris Dijkerman; Robert D McIntosh; A David Milner; Yves Rossetti; Caroline Tilikete; Richard C Roberts
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-09-04       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Reaction times and perceptual adjustments are sensitive to the illusory distortion of space.

Authors:  Silvia Savazzi; Barbara Emanuele; Paige Scalf; Diane Beck
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-02-05       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Spatial distortions in localization and midline estimation in hemianopia and normal vision.

Authors:  Francesca C Fortenbaugh; Thomas M VanVleet; Michael A Silver; Lynn C Robertson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2015-04-11       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Visual acceleration and spatial distortion in right brain-damaged patients.

Authors:  Luca Latini Corazzini; Giuliano Geminiani; Natale Stucchi; Patrizia Gindri; Luigi Cremasco
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-10-15       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  Spatial neglect and attention networks.

Authors:  Maurizio Corbetta; Gordon L Shulman
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 12.449

6.  Size Isn't All that Matters: Noticing Differences in Size and Temporal Order.

Authors:  Elaine B Wencil; Petya Radoeva; Anjan Chatterjee
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 7.  What Do Spatial Distortions in Patients' Drawing After Right Brain Damage Teach Us About Space Representation in Art?

Authors:  Gilles Rode; Giuseppe Vallar; Eric Chabanat; Patrice Revol; Yves Rossetti
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-06-26
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.