Literature DB >> 9834731

1998 clinical practice guidelines for the management of diabetes in Canada. Canadian Diabetes Association.

S Meltzer1, L Leiter, D Daneman, H C Gerstein, D Lau, S Ludwig, J F Yale, B Zinman, D Lillie.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To revise and expand the 1992 edition of the clinical practice guidelines for the management of diabetes in Canada incorporating recent advances in diagnosis and outpatient management of diabetes mellitus and to identify and assess the evidence supporting these recommendations. OPTIONS: All aspects of ambulatory diabetes care, including organization, responsibilities, classification, diagnosis, management of metabolic disorders, and methods for screening, prevention and treatment of complications in all forms of diabetes were reviewed, revised as required and expressed as a set of recommendations. OUTCOMES: Reclassification of types of diabetes based on pathogenesis; increased sensitivity of diagnostic criteria; recommendations for screening for diabetes; improved delivery of care; recommendations for tighter metabolic control; and optimal methods for screening, prevention and treatment of complications of diabetes. EVIDENCE: All recommendations were developed using a justifiable and reproducible process involving an explicit method for the citation and evaluation of the supporting evidence. VALUES: All recommendations were reviewed by an expert committee that included people with diabetes, family physicians, dietitians, nurses, diabetologists, as well as other subspecialists and methodologists from across Canada. BENEFITS, HARM AND COSTS: More aggressive screening strategies and more sensitive testing and diagnostic procedures will allow earlier detection and management of diabetes. Cost-effectiveness analyses suggest that this will lead to savings in health care costs relating to diabetes care by reducing the incidence of complications of diabetes. Similarly, tighter metabolic control in most people with diabetes, through intensive diabetes management, seeks to reduce the incidence of complications and, hence, their associated social and economic burdens. RECOMMENDATIONS: This document contains numerous detailed recommendations pertaining to all aspects of ambulatory diabetes care, ranging from service delivery to prevention and treatment of diabetes-related complications. The terms "insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus" and "non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus" should be replaced by the terms "type 1" and "type 2" diabetes. Testing for diabetes using fasting plasma glucose (FPG) level should be performed every 3 years in those over 45 years of age. More frequent or earlier testing should be considered for people with additional specific risk factors for diabetes. The FPG level at which diabetes is diagnosed should be reduced from 7.8 to 7.0 mmol/L to improve the sensitivity of the main diagnostic criterion and reduce the number of missed diagnoses. Depending on the type of diabetes and the therapy required to achieve euglycemia, people with diabetes should generally strive for close metabolic control to achieve optimal glucose levels. This entails receiving appropriate diabetes education through a diabetes health care team, diligent self-monitoring of blood glucose, attention to lifestyle and adjustments in diet and physical activity, and the appropriate and stepwise use of oral agents and insulin therapies needed to maintain glycemic control. Also highlighted is the need for appropriate surveillance programs for complications and management options. VALIDATION: All recommendations were graded according to the strength of the evidence and consensus of all relevant stakeholders. Collateral efforts of the American Diabetes Association and the World Health Organization and the input of international experts were also considered throughout the revision process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9834731      PMCID: PMC1255890     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  5 in total

1.  Stroke unit treatment. Long-term effects.

Authors:  B Indredavik; S A Slørdahl; F Bakke; R Rokseth; L L Håheim
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 7.914

2.  Guidelines for the management of patients with acute ischemic stroke. A statement for healthcare professionals from a special writing group of the Stroke Council, American Heart Association.

Authors:  H P Adams; T G Brott; R M Crowell; A J Furlan; C R Gomez; J Grotta; C M Helgason; J R Marler; R F Woolson; J A Zivin
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 7.914

3.  Stroke units versus general medical wards, I: twelve- and eighteen-month survival: a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  O M Rønning; B Guldvog
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 7.914

4.  Benefit of a stroke unit: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  B Indredavik; F Bakke; R Solberg; R Rokseth; L L Haaheim; I Holme
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 7.914

5.  Medical treatment for stroke prevention.

Authors:  D B Matchar; D C McCrory; H J Barnett; J R Feussner
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1994-07-01       Impact factor: 25.391

  5 in total
  89 in total

1.  Screening for gestational diabetes mellitus. A simple test may make it easier to study whether screening is worthwhile.

Authors:  E Rey
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-09-25

2.  Dilution of the 75-g oral glucose tolerance test increases postprandial glycemia: implications for diagnostic criteria.

Authors:  J L Sievenpiper; D J Jenkins; R G Josse; V Vuksan
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2000-04-04       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Practice tips. Surveillance for type 2 diabetes and its complications. Committee on Utilization Review and Education.

Authors:  I M Neimanis; J M Paterson
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  An observational study comparing 2-hour 75-g oral glucose tolerance with fasting plasma glucose in pregnant women: both poorly predictive of birth weight.

Authors:  Christian Ouzilleau; Marie-Andrée Roy; Louiselle Leblanc; André Carpentier; Pierre Maheux
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2003-02-18       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Does screening for gestational diabetes mellitus make a difference?

Authors:  Mathew Sermer
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2003-02-18       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Barriers to appropriate diabetes management among homeless people in Toronto.

Authors:  S W Hwang; A L Bugeja
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2000-07-25       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Association of systolic blood pressure with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 36): prospective observational study.

Authors:  A I Adler; I M Stratton; H A Neil; J S Yudkin; D R Matthews; C A Cull; A D Wright; R C Turner; R R Holman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-08-12

8.  Children are not small adults.

Authors:  Heather Dean; Elizabeth Sellers; Patricia Birk; Tom Blydt-Hansen; Malcolm Ogborn
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2003-02-04       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 9.  Identifying and managing patients at low risk of bowel cancer in general practice.

Authors:  M R Thompson; I Heath; B G Ellis; E T Swarbrick; L Faulds Wood; W S Atkin
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-08-02

Review 10.  Diagnosis and management of diabetic neuropathy.

Authors:  Bruce A Perkins; Vera Bril
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.810

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.