Literature DB >> 1866749

Benefit of a stroke unit: a randomized controlled trial.

B Indredavik1, F Bakke, R Solberg, R Rokseth, L L Haaheim, I Holme.   

Abstract

In a randomized controlled trial we compared the clinical outcome of acute stroke patients, 110 of whom were allocated to treatment in a stroke unit and 110 to treatment in general medical wards. No significant difference existed between these groups with regard to sex, age, marital status, medical history, or functional impairment on admission. Outcome was measured at 6 and 52 weeks after the stroke by the proportion of patients at home, the proportion of patients in an institution, the mortality, and the functional state. After 6 weeks 56.4% of the patients randomized to the stroke unit and 32.7% of the patients randomized to the general medical wards were at home (p = 0.0004), and after 52 weeks 62.7% and 44.6%, respectively, were at home (p = 0.002). After 6 weeks 36.3% of the patients from the stroke unit and 50.0% from the general medical wards were in an institution (p = 0.02); after 52 weeks 12.7% and 22.7%, respectively, were institutionalized (p = 0.016). After 6 weeks mortality was 7.3% for the stroke unit group and 17.3% for the general medical wards group (p = 0.027). After 52 weeks mortality was 24.6% for the stroke unit group and 32.7% for the general medical wards group (difference not significant). Functional state was significantly better for patients treated in the stroke unit after both 6 and 52 weeks. We conclude that care of patients with acute stroke in a stroke unit improves clinical outcome compared with treatment in general medical wards.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1866749     DOI: 10.1161/01.str.22.8.1026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  48 in total

Review 1.  Knowledge, patterns of care, and outcomes of care for generalists and specialists.

Authors:  L R Harrold; T S Field; J H Gurwitz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  [Recommendations of the European Stroke Initiative (EUSI) for treatment of ischemic stroke--update 2003. Part 2: prevention and rehabilitation].

Authors:  Sonja Külkens; Peter Arthur Ringleb; Werner Hacke
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.214

Review 3.  Formal rehabilitation after stroke.

Authors:  N Freemantle; C Pollock; T A Sheldon; J M Mason; F Song; A F Long; S Ibbotson
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1992-06

Review 4.  Services for people with stroke.

Authors:  D T Wade
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1993-12

Review 5.  Diagnosis and management of acute ischemic stroke: speed is critical.

Authors:  Tapuwa D Musuka; Stephen B Wilton; Mouhieddin Traboulsi; Michael D Hill
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  [New developments in German stroke units].

Authors:  J H Faiss; O Busse; E B Ringelstein
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.214

7.  Nutritional status after acute stroke: is a stroke unit better than a general geriatric ward?

Authors:  M Srinivasan; C Roffe
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.075

8.  Is Canada falling behind international standards for stroke care?

Authors:  A M Hakim; F Silver; C Hodgson
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1998-09-22       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  Fifteen-year outcomes of an acute medical admission unit.

Authors:  Richard Conway; Declan Byrne; Seán Cournane; Deirdre O'Riordan; Bernard Silke
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2018-03-17       Impact factor: 1.568

10.  Quality of stroke care at an Irish Regional General Hospital and Stroke Rehabilitation Unit.

Authors:  T Walsh; J Browne; E Ugwu; R O' Riordan; D Lyons
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 1.568

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.