Literature DB >> 9834347

Intra-abdominal abscesses following laparoscopic and open appendectomies.

P S Paik1, J A Towson, G J Anthone, A E Ortega, A J Simons, R W Beart.   

Abstract

Recent findings in a small number of studies have suggested a trend toward increased infectious complications following laparoscopic appendectomy. The purpose of the present review was to evaluate the incidence of postappendectomy intra-abdominal abscess formation following laparoscopic and open appendectomies. Using the surgical database of the Los Angeles County-University of Southern California Medical Center, we reviewed the records of all appendectomies performed at the center between March 1993 and September 1995. Incidental appendectomies as well as appendectomies in pediatric patients under the age of 18 years were excluded. A total of 2497 appendectomies were identified; indications for these procedures included acute appendicitis in 1422 cases (57%), gangrenous appendicitis in 289 (12%), and perforated appendicitis in 786 (31%). The intraoperative diagnosis made by the surgeon was used for classification. A two-tailed P value of <0.05 was considered significant. There was no significant difference in the rate of abscess formation between the groups undergoing open and laparoscopic appendectomies for acute and gangrenous appendicitis. In patients with perforated appendicitis, a total of 26 postappendectomy intra-abdominal abscesses occurred following 786 appendectomies for an overall abscess formation rate of 3.3%. Eighteen abscesses occurred following 683 open appendectomies (2.6%), six abscesses occurred following 67 laparoscopic appendectomies (9.0%), and the remaining two abscesses occurred following 36 converted cases (5.6%). For perforated appendicitis, however, there was a statistically significant increase in the rate of abscess formation following laparoscopic appendectomy compared to conventional open appendectomy (9.0% vs. 2.6%, P = 0.015). There was no significant difference in the rate of abscess formation between open vs. converted cases or between laparoscopic vs. converted cases. A comparison of the length of the postoperative hospital stay showed no significant difference between open and laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis (6.1 days vs. 5.9 days). Laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis is associated with a higher rate of postoperative intra-abdominal abscess formation without the benefit of a shortened hospital stay. Given these findings, laparoscopic appendectomy is not recommended in patients with perforated appendicitis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9834347     DOI: 10.1016/s1091-255x(97)80108-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  8 in total

1.  Laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis.

Authors:  R C Frazee; W T Bohannon
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1996-05

2.  Laparoscopic appendectomy: is it worth it?

Authors:  R C Buckley; T J Hall; F F Muakkassa; B Anglin; R S Rhodes; C E Scott-Conner
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 0.688

3.  Endoscopic appendectomy.

Authors:  K Semm
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 10.093

4.  A prospective randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy.

Authors:  S E Attwood; A D Hill; P G Murphy; J Thornton; R B Stephens
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 3.982

5.  Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy.

Authors:  V L Vallina; J M Velasco; C S McCulloch
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  A prospective, randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy. Laparoscopic Appendectomy Study Group.

Authors:  A E Ortega; J G Hunter; J H Peters; L L Swanstrom; B Schirmer
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Open versus laparoscopic appendectomy. A prospective randomized comparison.

Authors:  L C Martin; I Puente; J L Sosa; A Bassin; R Breslaw; M G McKenney; E Ginzburg; D Sleeman
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy.

Authors:  F Bonanni; J Reed; G Hartzell; D Trostle; R Boorse; M Gittleman; A Cole
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 6.113

  8 in total
  31 in total

1.  Laparoscopic appendectomy is a favorable alternative for complicated appendicitis in children.

Authors:  Mohammad Saquib Mallick; Aayed Al-Qahtani; Abdulrahman Al-Bassam
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2006-11-09       Impact factor: 1.827

2.  Securing the appendiceal stump in laparoscopic appendectomy: evidence for routine stapling?

Authors:  G Kazemier; K H in't Hof; S Saad; H J Bonjer; S Sauerland
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-07-03       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  [Relaparoscopy as an alternative to laparotomy for laparoscopic complications].

Authors:  I Leister; H Becker
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  Laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis.

Authors:  Jimmy B Y So; Ee-Cherk Chiong; Edmond Chiong; Wei-Keat Cheah; David Lomanto; Peter Goh; Cheng-Kiong Kum
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2002-09-26       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Complicated appendicitis: laparoscopic or conventional surgery?

Authors:  Boris Kirshtein; Michael Bayme; Sergey Domchik; Solly Mizrahi; Leonid Lantsberg
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Laparoscopic appendectomy in the elderly.

Authors:  Y-C Wang; H-R Yang; P-K Chung; L-B Jeng; R-J Chen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-05-11       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis in children.

Authors:  Sheraz R Markar; Simon Blackburn; Richard Cobb; Alan Karthikesalingam; Jessica Evans; James Kinross; Omar Faiz
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Surgical site infection after laparoscopic and open appendectomy: a multicenter large consecutive cohort study.

Authors:  Yan Xiao; Gang Shi; Jin Zhang; Jian-Guo Cao; Li-Jun Liu; Ting-Hao Chen; Zhi-Zhou Li; Hong Wang; Han Zhang; Zhao-Fen Lin; Jun-Hua Lu; Tian Yang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-10-11       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Value of laparoscopic appendectomy in the elderly patient.

Authors:  Boris Kirshtein; Zvi Howard Perry; Solly Mizrahi; Leonid Lantsberg
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Laparoscopic appendicectomy is associated with a lower complication rate even during the introductory phase.

Authors:  Matthias Kapischke; Juergen Tepel; Klaus Bley
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2004-09-04       Impact factor: 3.445

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.