Literature DB >> 9832175

Assessment of a new dipstick test in screening for microalbuminuria in patients with hypertension.

L M Gerber1, K Johnston, M H Alderman.   

Abstract

The prevalence of elevated urinary albumin levels is significantly greater in hypertensive than in normotensive subjects. To determine the sensitivity and specificity of a new dipstick test for microalbunimuria (the Micral-Test), 171 hypertensive patients were studied at a union-sponsored hypertension treatment program. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and correlation coefficients between urinary albumin concentration results obtained by the Micral-Test and by nephelometry were determined in three urine samples. Sensitivity values of the Micral-Test, compared with 24-h nephelometry, were 81%, 75%, and 92% in a 24-h, overnight, and random sample, respectively. Specificity values were 89%, 90%, and 63% in the three samples, respectively. Positive predictive value ranged from 41% to 67%, whereas negative predictive value ranged from 93% to 97%. Correlation coefficients between the logarithms of albumin concentrations obtained from the three different urine specimens using nephelometry fell between 0.71 and 0.78, whereas those obtained with the Micral-Test fell between 0.49 and 0.71, and across techniques, 0.29 to 0.53 (all P < .001). Results obtained with both nephelometry and the Micral-Test using overnight and random urine collections approximated those obtained with 24-h collection. These results, coupled with the ease and convenience of both specimen collection and the Micral-Test itself, support the use of the test as a valuable screening tool for microalbuminuria in patients with hypertension.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9832175     DOI: 10.1016/s0895-7061(98)00136-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hypertens        ISSN: 0895-7061            Impact factor:   2.689


  5 in total

1.  [Microalbuminuria in hypertensive patients in primary care].

Authors:  Alberto Martínez Castelao; Verónica Duarte-Gallego; Itziar Navarro-Zorita; Jordi Galera Llorca
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 1.137

Review 2.  Urinary strips for protein assays: easy to do but difficult to interpret!

Authors:  Guillaume Résimont; Laurence Piéroni; Edith Bigot-Corbel; Etienne Cavalier; Pierre Delanaye
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 3.902

3.  Renal and cardiovascular risk predictive value of two different microalbuminuria screening methods in patients with hypertension with/without diabetes in Portugal.

Authors:  J Polónia; D Carvalho; J Nazaré; L Martins; P M da Silva; C Aguiar; M C Manso; T Carqueja
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 3.012

4.  Patterns of antihypertensive drug utilization in primary care.

Authors:  D Pittrow; W Kirch; P Bramlage; H Lehnert; M Höfler; T Unger; A M Sharma; H-U Wittchen
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2004-03-20       Impact factor: 2.953

5.  Prevalence and determinants of microalbuminuria among diabetic patients in the United Arab Emirates.

Authors:  Fatma Al-Maskari; Mohammed El-Sadig; Enyioma Obineche
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2008-01-29       Impact factor: 2.388

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.