Literature DB >> 9832010

Absorbed dose determination at short distance from 60Co and 192Ir brachytherapy sources.

H Tölli1, K A Johansson.   

Abstract

This paper presents two methods for absorbed dose determination with ionization chambers at short distance from 60Co and 192Ir brachytherapy sources. The methods are modifications of the Bragg-Gray and large cavity principles given in the IAEA code of practice for high- and medium-energy photon beams. A non-uniformity correction factor to account for the non-uniform electron fluence in the air cavity is introduced into the methods. The absorbed dose rates were determined from ionization chamber measurements at distances between 1.5 and 5.0 cm from the brachytherapy sources. The agreement between the two methods is excellent in 60Co brachytherapy dosimetry. For 192Ir dosimetry, the difference is less than 2.5% at all distances. In absorbed dose rate calculations with the 60Co brachytherapy source, the ratios between calculated and experimentally determined absorbed dose rates are 0.987 and 0.994 depending on the method used for absorption and scatter correction. In 192Ir dosimetry, the large cavity principle gives almost identical values to those which can be obtained with the AAPM recommendations. Using the chambers according to the Bragg-Gray principle in 192Ir dosimetry, the agreement with AAPM calculated absorbed dose rates is within 2.5% at all distances. The uncertainty, expressed as one standard deviation, in the experimentally determined absorbed dose is estimated to be between 3 and 4%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9832010     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/43/11/002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  2 in total

1.  Evaluation of BEBIG HDR (60)Co system for non-invasive image-guided breast brachytherapy.

Authors:  Mehdi Zehtabian; Sedigheh Sina; Mark J Rivard; Ali S Meigooni
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2015-12-30

2.  Comparison of TLD calibration methods for 192Ir dosimetry.

Authors:  Annette Haworth; Duncan J Butler; Lisa Wilfert; Martin A Ebert; Stephen P Todd; Anna J M Hayton; Tomas Kron
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 2.102

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.