Literature DB >> 9832003

Home sample collection tests for HIV infection.

B M Branson1.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Home sample collection (HSC) tests allow persons to test themselves for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection at home without medical supervision. Characterizing the use of such tests can help assess their potential effect on public health efforts to prevent and control HIV.
OBJECTIVE: To describe use of HIV HSC tests.
DESIGN: Retrospective descriptive analysis from data collected by test manufacturers during 1996 and 1997.
SETTING: United States. PARTICIPANTS: Volunteer sample of consumers who used either of 2 HSC tests. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Demographic and behavioral aspects of users.
RESULTS: During the first year of availability, 174316 HIV HSC tests were submitted to the manufacturers for analysis; 0.9% of the results were positive for HIV, and 97% of all users called to learn test results. Survey responses from 70620 HIV-negative and 865 HIV-positive users revealed that most were men, white, and aged 25 to 34 years; HIV prevalence was highest among nonwhites, aged 35 to 44 years, men who have sex with men, and injection drug users. Bisexual men accounted for a large proportion of HIV-positive users. Nearly 60% of all users and 49% of those who tested HIV positive had never been tested before. Telephone counselors found that 23% of HIV-positive users already had a source of follow-up care, 65% accepted referrals, and 12% had tested themselves to evaluate the effects of antiretroviral therapy.
CONCLUSIONS: Home sample collection tests for HIV were used by persons who were at risk for HIV and by persons who did not use other testing. Most HIV-positive users either had a source of medical care or received referrals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9832003     DOI: 10.1001/jama.280.19.1699

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  21 in total

1.  Home HIV testing: why not in Canada?

Authors: 
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2000-05-30       Impact factor: 8.262

2. 

Authors:  Walter H Curioso; Magaly M Blas; Ann E Kurth; Jeffrey D Klausner
Journal:  Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Publica       Date:  2007-07-27

3.  Testing for HIV infection in the United States.

Authors:  Lindsey L Wolf; Rochelle P Walensky
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.725

4.  HIV testing updates and challenges: when regulatory caution and public health imperatives collide.

Authors:  Bernard M Branson
Journal:  Curr HIV/AIDS Rep       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 5.071

5.  Human Immunodeficiency Virus Testing Practices and Interest in Self-Testing Options Among Young, Black Men Who Have Sex With Men in North Carolina.

Authors:  Christopher B Hurt; Karina Soni; William C Miller; Lisa B Hightow-Weidman
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.830

6.  Longitudinal effects of home-based HIV self-testing on well-being and health empowerment among men who have sex with men (MSM) in the United States.

Authors:  Tyler B Wray; Philip A Chan; Erik M Simpanen
Journal:  AIDS Care       Date:  2019-05-31

7.  Self-testing for HIV and its impact on public health.

Authors:  Christopher B Hurt; Kimberly A Powers
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.830

8.  Experiences and correlates of HIV self-testing among men who have sex with men in Jiangsu province, China.

Authors:  Hongjing Yan; Haitao Yang; H Fisher Raymond; Jianjun Li; Ling-En Shi; Xiping Huan; Chongyi Wei
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2015-03

9.  Home HIV testing: good news but not a game changer.

Authors:  A David Paltiel; Rochelle P Walensky
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 10.  Home testing for HIV infection in resource-limited settings.

Authors:  Ishani Ganguli; Ingrid V Bassett; Krista L Dong; Rochelle P Walensky
Journal:  Curr HIV/AIDS Rep       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 5.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.