Literature DB >> 9831832

Long-term results (7 to 10 years) of endoscopic papillotomy for choledocholithiasis. Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors for the recurrence of biliary symptoms.

J C Pereira-Lima1, R Jakobs, U H Winter, C Benz, W R Martin, H E Adamek, J F Riemann.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The long-term outcome after endoscopic papillotomy is poorly defined. The aim of this study was to determine the long-term results of this method in the treatment of common duct calculi and to determine which prognostic factors are associated with the relapse of biliary symptoms.
METHODS: Between 1985 and 1988, 223 consecutive (149 women, mean age 67.9 years) patients underwent endoscopic papillotomy for duct stones; 127 had already undergone cholecystectomy or underwent this operation during the same hospitalization. Follow-up data were obtained retrospectively from the patients and patients' relatives and general practitioners.
RESULTS: The procedure was successful in 217 of 223 cases (97%), of which 203 were followed-up; 2 patients died in the first month after treatment (0.89%). Mean follow-up for the 201 patients was 6.2 years, during which 31 relapsed (15%). Three significant prognostic factors for late complications were identified in a multivariate analysis. The recurrence rate of biliary symptoms in patients who were left with an in situ gallbladder was 20.2%, and 11% for those whose gallbladder was removed (p = 0.04). Patients with a bile duct 15 mm or greater in diameter were more prone to recurrence of symptoms than those with a bile duct 10 mm or less in diameter (41% vs. 10%, p = 0.025) and were especially at higher risk to develop recurrent stones (19.5% vs. 4.9%, p = 0.019). Stone recurrence, but not biliary symptoms as a whole, was more frequent in patients with a peripapillary diverticulum (p = 0.035).
CONCLUSIONS: The long-term results of endoscopic papillotomy are comparable with those of surgical techniques. The prognostic factors associated with relapse of biliary symptoms as a whole are gallbladder left in situ and choledochal diameter. Bile duct size and peripapillary diverticula are associated with recurrent bile duct stones.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9831832     DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(98)70085-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  45 in total

Review 1.  Biliary sphincterotomy: less benign than once thought?

Authors:  J Baillie
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  1999-04

2.  Is cholecystectomy necessary after endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones in patients older than 80 years of age?

Authors:  Takaharu Yasui; Shunichi Takahata; Hiroshi Kono; Yosuke Nagayoshi; Yasuhisa Mori; Kosuke Tsutsumi; Yoshihiko Sadakari; Takao Ohtsuka; Masafumi Nakamura; Masao Tanaka
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 7.527

3.  Laparoscopic management of common bile duct stones.

Authors:  S Ebner; J Rechner; S Beller; K Erhart; F M Riegler; G Szinicz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-02-02       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Recurrent bile duct stones after endoscopic sphincterotomy.

Authors:  S Sultan; J Baillie
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Endoscopic retreatment of recurrent choledocholithiasis after sphincterotomy.

Authors:  M Sugiyama; Y Suzuki; N Abe; T Masaki; T Mori; Y Atomi
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Juxtapapillary duodenal diverticula risk development and recurrence of biliary stone.

Authors:  Kang Suk Ko; Seong Hun Kim; Hyun Chul Kim; In Hee Kim; Seung-Ok Lee
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 2.153

7.  Routine laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis in octogenarians: is it worth the risk?

Authors:  R Costi; D DiMauro; A Mazzeo; A S Boselli; S Contini; V Violi; L Roncoroni; L Sarli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-11-16       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  An audit of the outcome of long-term biliary stenting in the treatment of common bile duct stones in a general hospital.

Authors:  Tiing Leong Ang; Kwong Ming Fock; Eng Kiong Teo; Tju Siang Chua; Jessica Tan
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 7.527

9.  Risk factors of acute cholecystitis after endoscopic common bile duct stone removal.

Authors:  Jun Kyu Lee; Ji Kon Ryu; Joo Kyung Park; Won Jae Yoon; Sang Hyub Lee; Kwang Hyuck Lee; Yong-Tae Kim; Yong Bum Yoon
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-02-14       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Long-term prognosis after treatment of patients with choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  Kazuhisa Uchiyama; Hironobu Onishi; Masaji Tani; Hiroyuki Kinoshita; Manabu Kawai; Masaki Ueno; Hiroki Yamaue
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.