Literature DB >> 9831738

The Von Restorff effect in visual object recognition memory in humans and monkeys. The role of frontal/perirhinal interaction.

A Parker1, E Wilding, C Akerman.   

Abstract

This study reports the development of a new, modified delayed matching to sample (DMS) visual recognition memory task that controls the relative novelty of test stimuli and can be used in human and nonhuman primates. We report findings from normal humans and unoperated monkeys, as well as three groups of operated monkeys. In the study phase of this modified paradigm, subjects studied lists of two-dimensional visual object stimuli. In the test phase each studied object was presented again, now paired with a new stimulus (a foil), and the subject had to choose the studied item. In some lists one study item (the novel or isolate item) and its associated foil differed from the others (the homogenous items) along one stimulus dimension (color). The critical experimental measure was the comparison of the visual object recognition error rates for isolate and homogenous test items. This task was initially administered to human subjects and unoperated monkeys. Error rates for both groups were reliably lower for isolate than for homogenous stimuli in the same list position (the von Restorff effect). The task was then administered to three groups of monkeys who had selective brain lesions. Monkeys with bilateral lesions of the amygdata and fornix, two structures that have been proposed to play a role in novelty and memory encoding, were similar to normal monkeys in their performance on this task. Two further groups--with disconnection lesions of the perirhinal cortex and either the prefrontal cortex or the magnocellular mediodorsal thalamus--showed no evidence of a von Restorff effect. These findings are not consistent with previous proposals that the hippocampus and amygdala constitute a general novelty processing network. Instead, the results support an interaction between the perirhinal and frontal cortices in the processing of certain kinds of novel information that support visual object recognition memory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9831738     DOI: 10.1162/089892998563103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  13 in total

1.  Recollection and familiarity in recognition memory: an event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging study.

Authors:  R N Henson; M D Rugg; T Shallice; O Josephs; R J Dolan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-05-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Novelty effects on recollection and familiarity in recognition memory.

Authors:  Mark M Kishiyama; Andrew P Yonelinas
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-10

Review 3.  Models in search of a brain.

Authors:  Bradley C Love; Todd M Gureckis
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Neural conflict-control mechanisms improve memory for target stimuli.

Authors:  Ruth M Krebs; Carsten N Boehler; Maya De Belder; Tobias Egner
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Non-goal-directed recall of specific events in apes after long delays.

Authors:  Amy Lewis; Josep Call; Dorthe Berntsen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Insights into human behavior from lesions to the prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Sara M Szczepanski; Robert T Knight
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) show the isolation effect during serial list recognition memory tests.

Authors:  Michael J Beran
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 3.084

8.  Categorization in the monkey hippocampus: a possible mechanism for encoding information into memory.

Authors:  Robert E Hampson; Tim P Pons; Terrence R Stanford; Sam A Deadwyler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-02-20       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Enhanced memory for scenes presented at behaviorally relevant points in time.

Authors:  Jeffrey Y Lin; Amanda D Pype; Scott O Murray; Geoffrey M Boynton
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  Early detection and late cognitive control of emotional distraction by the prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Javier García-Pacios; Pilar Garcés; David Del Río; Fernando Maestú
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.